Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

180° versus 360° Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in Open Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PRECIS: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that 360° selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is significantly more effective than 180° SLT at reducing intraocular pressure at one month and one year follow-ups, without increased serious adverse event risk.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of 180° versus 360° selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in adults with open angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT).

METHODS: A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases, from 1995 to December 30, 2023, for studies comparing 180° and 360° SLT in adults with OAG and OHT (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024497832). Meta-analyses were performed to calculate nominal percent and raw reductions in IOP between treatment groups at one-month, one-year, and two-year follow-ups, as well as success rates, defined as a 20% or greater IOP reduction.

RESULTS: Nine studies with 1044 eyes were included; 491 received 180°SLT and 553 received 360° SLT. At the one-month follow-up, 360° SLT reduced IOP by 3.45% more (WMD=3.45; 95% CI: 2.02-4.88; P<0.00001) and 0.87 mmHg more (WMD=0.87; 95% CI: 0.35-1.38; P=0.0010). At the one-year follow-up, 360° SLT reduced IOP by 4.33% more (WMD=4.33; 95% CI: 2.35-6.32; P<0.0001) and 1.15 mmHg more (WMD=1.15; 95% CI: 0.25-2.04; P=0.01). At two years of follow up, 360° SLT reduced IOP by 4.86% more (WMD=4.86; 95% CI: -0.32, 10.0; P=0.07) and 1.25 mmHg more (WMD=1.25; 95% CI: -0.29, 2.79; P=0.11), however the difference was not statistically significant. Compared to 360° SLT, 180° SLT had a significantly lower success rate (OR=0.50; 95% CI: 0.35-0.72; P=0.0002). There was no difference in serious complications between interventions.

CONCLUSION: 360° SLT is more effective than 180° SLT at lowering IOP at one-month and one-year follow-ups as well as achieving successful IOP control without increased risk of serious complications.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app