We have located links that may give you full text access.
Sedimentation field-flow fractionation for rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing: a pilot study.
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2024 May 7
BACKGROUND: The increase in antibiotic resistance is a major public health issue. The development of rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methods is becoming a priority to ensure early and appropriate antibiotic therapy.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate sedimentation field-flow fractionation (SdFFF) as a method for performing AST in less than 3 h.
METHODS: SdFFF is based on the detection of early biophysical changes in bacteria, using a chromatographic-type technology. One hundred clinical Escherichia coli strains were studied. A calibrated bacterial suspension was incubated for 2 h at 37°C in the absence (untreated) or presence (treated) of five antibiotics used at EUCAST breakpoint concentrations. Bacterial suspensions were then injected into the SdFFF machine. For each E. coli isolate, retention times and elution profiles of antibiotic-treated bacteria were compared with retention times and elution profiles of untreated bacteria. Algorithms comparing retention times and elution profiles were used to determine if the strain was susceptible or resistant. Performance evaluation was done according to CLSI and the ISO standard 20776-2:2021 with broth microdilution used as the reference method.
RESULTS: AST results from SdFFF were obtained in less than 3 h. SdFFF showed high categorical agreement (99.8%), sensitivity (99.5%) and specificity (100.0%) with broth microdilution. Results for each antimicrobial were also in agreement with the ISO 20776-2 recommendations, with sensitivity and specificity of ≥95.0%.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that SdFFF can be used as a rapid, accurate and reliable phenotypic AST method with a turnaround time of less than 3 h.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate sedimentation field-flow fractionation (SdFFF) as a method for performing AST in less than 3 h.
METHODS: SdFFF is based on the detection of early biophysical changes in bacteria, using a chromatographic-type technology. One hundred clinical Escherichia coli strains were studied. A calibrated bacterial suspension was incubated for 2 h at 37°C in the absence (untreated) or presence (treated) of five antibiotics used at EUCAST breakpoint concentrations. Bacterial suspensions were then injected into the SdFFF machine. For each E. coli isolate, retention times and elution profiles of antibiotic-treated bacteria were compared with retention times and elution profiles of untreated bacteria. Algorithms comparing retention times and elution profiles were used to determine if the strain was susceptible or resistant. Performance evaluation was done according to CLSI and the ISO standard 20776-2:2021 with broth microdilution used as the reference method.
RESULTS: AST results from SdFFF were obtained in less than 3 h. SdFFF showed high categorical agreement (99.8%), sensitivity (99.5%) and specificity (100.0%) with broth microdilution. Results for each antimicrobial were also in agreement with the ISO 20776-2 recommendations, with sensitivity and specificity of ≥95.0%.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that SdFFF can be used as a rapid, accurate and reliable phenotypic AST method with a turnaround time of less than 3 h.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Contrast-induced acute kidney injury: a review of definition, pathogenesis, risk factors, prevention and treatment.BMC Nephrology 2024 April 23
Hemodynamic Support in Sepsis.Anesthesiology 2024 June 2
The New Challenge of Obesity - Obesity-Associated Nephropathy.Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity 2024
Advances in Clinical Cardiology 2023: A Summary of Key Clinical Trials.Advances in Therapy 2024 May 15
Oral Anticoagulation Use in Individuals With Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Review.Seminars in Nephrology 2024 May 15
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app