We have located links that may give you full text access.
AST and ALT Elevation in Suspected Physical Abuse: Can the Threshold to Obtain an Abdominal CT be Raised?
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 2024 March 27
BACKGROUND: Identification of abdominal injury (AI) in children with concern for physical abuse is important as it can provide important medical and forensic information. Current recommendations are to obtain screening liver function tests (LFTs) in all children with suspected physical abuse and an abdominal computed tomography (CT) when the aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) is >80 IU/L. This threshold to obtain an abdominal CT is lower than general trauma guidelines which use a cutoff of AST > 200 or ALT >125 IU/L.
METHODS: This was a retrospective review of children ages 0-60 months at a single pediatric tertiary care center who were evaluated for physical abuse and had AST or ALT >80 IU/L. Subjects were then stratified into two groups: mid-range (AST < 200 and ALT <125 IU/L) and high-range (AST > 200 and/or ALT >125 IU/L) LFTs.
RESULTS: Abdominal CTs were performed in 55% (131/237) of subjects, 38% (50/131) with mid-range LFTs and 62% (81/131) with high-range LFTs. AI was identified in 19.8% (26/131) of subjects. Subjects with AI were older than those without AI [mean age (SD) 18.7 (12.5) vs. 11.6 (12.2) months, p = 0.009]. The highest yield of abdominal CTs positive for AI was in the group with high-range LFTs with signs or symptoms of AI at 52.0% (13/25; 95% CI: 31.3-72.2%). The negative predictive value of having mid-range LFTs and no signs or symptoms of AI was 100% (95% CI: 97.0-100%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that abdominal CT may not be necessary in children being evaluated for physical abuse who have AST < 200 and ALT <125 IU/L and do not have signs or symptoms of AI. This could limit the number of abdominal CTs performed.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Diagnostic Test/Criteria.
METHODS: This was a retrospective review of children ages 0-60 months at a single pediatric tertiary care center who were evaluated for physical abuse and had AST or ALT >80 IU/L. Subjects were then stratified into two groups: mid-range (AST < 200 and ALT <125 IU/L) and high-range (AST > 200 and/or ALT >125 IU/L) LFTs.
RESULTS: Abdominal CTs were performed in 55% (131/237) of subjects, 38% (50/131) with mid-range LFTs and 62% (81/131) with high-range LFTs. AI was identified in 19.8% (26/131) of subjects. Subjects with AI were older than those without AI [mean age (SD) 18.7 (12.5) vs. 11.6 (12.2) months, p = 0.009]. The highest yield of abdominal CTs positive for AI was in the group with high-range LFTs with signs or symptoms of AI at 52.0% (13/25; 95% CI: 31.3-72.2%). The negative predictive value of having mid-range LFTs and no signs or symptoms of AI was 100% (95% CI: 97.0-100%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that abdominal CT may not be necessary in children being evaluated for physical abuse who have AST < 200 and ALT <125 IU/L and do not have signs or symptoms of AI. This could limit the number of abdominal CTs performed.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Diagnostic Test/Criteria.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
British Society for Rheumatology guideline on management of adult and juvenile onset Sjögren disease.Rheumatology 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Albumin: a comprehensive review and practical guideline for clinical use.European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2024 April 13
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app