Esophageal adenocarcinoma heterogeneity in clinicopathology and prognosis: A single center longitudinal study of 146 cases over a 20-year period.

Recent genomic studies suggest that esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is not homogeneous and can be divided into true (tEAC) and probable (pEAC) groups. We compared clinicopathologic and prognostic features between the two groups of EAC. Based on endoscopic, radiologic, surgical, and pathologic reports, tumors with epicenters beyond 2 cm of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) were assigned to the tEAC group (N = 63), while epicenters within 2 cm of, but not crossing the GEJ, were allocated to the pEAC group (N = 83). All 146 consecutive patients were male (age: median 70 years, range: 51-88) and White-predominant (98.6 %). There was no significant difference in gastroesophageal reflux disease, obesity, comorbidity, and the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus, and cases diagnosed during endoscopic surveillance. However, compared to the pEAC group, the tEAC group had significantly more cases with hiatal hernia (P = 0.003); their tumors were significantly smaller in size (P = 0.007), more frequently with tubular/papillary adenocarcinoma (P = 0.001), had fewer cases with poorly cohesive carcinoma (P = 0.018), and demonstrated better prognosis in stage I disease (P = 0.012); 5-year overall survival (34.9 months) was significantly longer (versus 16.8 months in pEACs) (P = 0.043). Compared to the patients without resection, the patients treated with endoscopic or surgical resection showed significantly better outcomes, irrespective of stages. We concluded that EACs were heterogeneous with two distinct tEAC and pEAC groups in clinicopathology and prognosis; resection remained the better option for improved outcomes. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: Esophageal adenocarcinoma can be divided into true or probable groups with distinct clinicopathology and better prognosis in the former than in the latter. we showed that resection remained the better option for improved outcomes.