Retrospective study of combined pelvic exenteration in the treatment of primary and recurrent pelvic malignant tumors.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic malignant tumors often originate in the rectum, bladder, uterus, and other organs. In patients with locally advanced tumours in the presence of direct invasion of one or more organs, negative tumor resection margin (R0) resection can be very beneficial to patient survival if it can be performed. As a multidisciplinary and high-risk surgical method, the pelvic exenteration (PE) procedure has only been reported in a few medical centres internationally. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients who had undergone PE surgery in our hospital, in order to provide ideas for the best treatment of patients with pelvic malignant tumors.

METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 59 patients with pelvic malignant tumors admitted to the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2015 to July 2021, all of whom received PE surgery. They were divided into two groups according to the location of the disease: the rectal cancer group (n=40) and the cervical cancer group (n=19). Statistical analysis was performed on the baseline and follow-up data of the two groups of patients.

RESULTS: (I) Patient baseline data. Compared to the rectal cancer group, more patients in the cervical cancer group received preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy (P=0.013), and had a lower R0 resection rate (P=0.037). Postoperative complications in patients with rectal cancer and cervical cancer were 27.5% and 47.3%, respectively. (II) Patient survival analysis after PE surgery. The 5-year survival rate was 36.6% in the rectal cancer group and 25.3% in the cervical cancer group. In the rectal cancer group, for the primary tumor, if there was no lymph node metastasis or no postoperative complications in the postoperative pathology, the patient had a good survival prognosis. Univariate analysis showed that recurrent rectal cancer, postoperative lymph node metastasis, postoperative complications, and microsatellite stability (MSS) were significant predictors of poor survival outcomes. Multivariate analysis showed that lymph node metastasis and postoperative complications were independent prognostic factors for patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS: PE is a viable option for pelvic malignancies; aggressive radical resection of lesions and reduced postoperative complications can effectively improve patient outcomes.