Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Operative Volumes and Postoperative Outcomes After Elective Resection of Congenital Lung Malformations in Infants.

Annals of Surgery 2024 March 14
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hospital- and surgeon-level operative volumes are associated with differences in postoperative outcomes among infants undergoing elective lung surgery for a congenital lung malformation (CLM).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Infant lung surgery is a relatively uncommon procedure performed by pediatric surgeons nationwide. The relationship between surgical volume and postoperative outcomes remains unknown.

METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of asymptomatic infants who underwent elective lung resection of a CLM was conducted using the Pediatric Health Information System database (2016-2020). Multivariable linear and poisson regressions were performed based on annual lung resection tertiles.

RESULTS: There were 1420 infants managed by 48 hospitals and 309 primary surgeons. Institutions that performed seven or fewer CLM resections per year (56%) were associated with significantly higher postoperative complication rates compared to medium- and high-volume hospitals (low: 134 [34%], medium: 110 [21%], high: 144 [29%]; P<0.001). Surgeons who performed one or fewer CLM resections per year (82%) were associated with significantly higher complication rates compared to medium- and high-volume surgeons (low: 171 [31%], medium: 75 [26%], high: 119 [24%]; P=0.02). Multivariable analyses confirmed that low-volume hospitals were associated with higher complications (OR 1.81, CI 1.38-2.37; P<0.001), and low-volume surgeons had an increased risk of complications (overall: OR 1.37, CI 1.01-1.84; P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study of infants undergoing elective lung resection for a CLM, lower volume providers were associated with higher postoperative patient morbidity. These findings represent an opportunity to inform quality improvement initiatives on pediatric lung resection and the debate on surgical subspecialization for this unique patient population.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app