We have located links that may give you full text access.
Association between red blood cell distribution width-to-platelet ratio and post-discharge readmission rate in patients with heart failure: A retrospective cohort study.
Heliyon 2024 Februrary 30
BACKGROUND: To date, no studies have investigated the association between red blood cell distribution width (RDW)-to-platelet ratio (RPR) and readmission rates among patients with heart failure (HF). As such, the present study aimed to examine the relationship between RPR and readmission rates in patients with HF.
METHODS: Data for this study were obtained from the Fourth People's Hospital (Zigong, Sichuan Province, China). Patients were diagnosed with HF in accordance with European Society of Cardiology criteria. The primary outcome was the 28-day readmission rate. Various logistic regression models were constructed to explore the association between RPR and the 28-day readmission rate.
RESULTS: The study comprised 1978 patients with HF, with a 28-day readmission rate of 6.98%. RPR emerged as an independent risk factor for 28-day readmission, evidenced by consistent results across the various regression-adjusted models. The covariate-adjusted propensity score model demonstrated that every 0.1 increase in RPR was associated with an 8.2% increase in 28-day readmission rate (odds ratio [OR] 1.082 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.012-1.158]; P = 0.0212). Similarly, each 0.1 change in RPR was associated with a 9.8% (OR 1.098 [95% CI 1.014-1.188]) and 7.3% (OR 1.073 [95% CI 0.991-1.161]) increase in 3- and 6-month readmission rates, respectively. However, RPR was not statistically associated with the 6-month readmission rate. Curve fit plots illustrated a nonlinear positive correlation between RPR and 28-day, and 3- and 6-month readmissions. Moreover, the effects of RPR on 28-day, and 3- and 6-month readmission rates remained robust across subgroup variables in stratified analysis. Finally, the effect sizes of pooled multiply imputed data were consistent with the original data, suggesting robust results.
CONCLUSION: RPR was an independent risk factor for 28-day readmission among patients with HF and also demonstrated modest predictive value for readmissions at 3 and 6 months, despite being non-significant for the 6-month readmission rate. Early identification of patients with HF with elevated RPR would facilitate management and may confer favorable effects on prognosis.
METHODS: Data for this study were obtained from the Fourth People's Hospital (Zigong, Sichuan Province, China). Patients were diagnosed with HF in accordance with European Society of Cardiology criteria. The primary outcome was the 28-day readmission rate. Various logistic regression models were constructed to explore the association between RPR and the 28-day readmission rate.
RESULTS: The study comprised 1978 patients with HF, with a 28-day readmission rate of 6.98%. RPR emerged as an independent risk factor for 28-day readmission, evidenced by consistent results across the various regression-adjusted models. The covariate-adjusted propensity score model demonstrated that every 0.1 increase in RPR was associated with an 8.2% increase in 28-day readmission rate (odds ratio [OR] 1.082 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.012-1.158]; P = 0.0212). Similarly, each 0.1 change in RPR was associated with a 9.8% (OR 1.098 [95% CI 1.014-1.188]) and 7.3% (OR 1.073 [95% CI 0.991-1.161]) increase in 3- and 6-month readmission rates, respectively. However, RPR was not statistically associated with the 6-month readmission rate. Curve fit plots illustrated a nonlinear positive correlation between RPR and 28-day, and 3- and 6-month readmissions. Moreover, the effects of RPR on 28-day, and 3- and 6-month readmission rates remained robust across subgroup variables in stratified analysis. Finally, the effect sizes of pooled multiply imputed data were consistent with the original data, suggesting robust results.
CONCLUSION: RPR was an independent risk factor for 28-day readmission among patients with HF and also demonstrated modest predictive value for readmissions at 3 and 6 months, despite being non-significant for the 6-month readmission rate. Early identification of patients with HF with elevated RPR would facilitate management and may confer favorable effects on prognosis.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
British Society for Rheumatology guideline on management of adult and juvenile onset Sjögren disease.Rheumatology 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Albumin: a comprehensive review and practical guideline for clinical use.European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2024 April 13
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app