Efficacy of nicorandil and ranolazine in prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with mild-to-moderate renal dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a common complication after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There is conflicting evidence regarding efficacy of nicorandil in CIN prevention. With respect to ranolazine, there is physiological possibility as well as data in animal study regarding its protective effect against CIN; there is, however, no human data till date.

AIM AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of nicorandil and ranolazine in preventing CIN. The secondary endpoint was to measure difference in postprocedure acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence across groups. Also, patients were followed up till 6 months for major adverse events.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: This single-center randomized controlled study included 315 patients of coronary artery disease with mild-to-moderate renal dysfunction undergoing elective PCI. Eligible patients were assigned to either nicorandil (n = 105), ranolazine (n = 105) or control group (n = 105) in 1 : 1 : 1 ratio by block randomization. All enrolled patients were given intravenous sodium chloride at rate of 1.0 mL/kg/h (0.5 mL/kg/h for patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <45%) from 6 h before procedure till 12 h after procedure. Iso-osmolar contrast agent (iodixanol) was used for all patients. In addition to hydration, patients in nicorandil group received oral nicorandil (10 mg, 3 times/d) and those in ranolazine group received oral ranolazine (1000 mg, 2 times/d) 1 day before procedure and for 2 days after PCI. Patients in control group received only hydration.

RESULTS: Total number of CIN was 34 (10.7%), which included 19 (18.1%) in control, 8 (7.6%) in nicorandil and 7 (6.6%) in ranolazine group. There was significant association of CIN reduction across groups (P = 0.012). On pairwise comparison also, there was significant benefit across control and ranolazine as well as control and nicorandil (P < 0.025). There was numerically higher incidence of AKI in controls; the difference, however, did not reach statistical significance after applying Bonferroni correction (P = 0.044). Over 6-month follow-up, adverse events were similar across groups.

CONCLUSION: While this study adds to existing literature that supports role for nicorandil in CIN prevention, the efficacy of ranolazine in protecting against CIN has been demonstrated in humans for the first time.