We have located links that may give you full text access.
Hemorrhoidectomy: Does Age Make a Difference?
Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 2024 Februrary 24
BACKGROUND: Grade II and III hemorrhoids often require a multimodal approach that may ultimately culminate to surgical resection. Age and overall medical conditioning around the time of diagnosis can often impact the decision.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate patients with a diagnosis of symptomatic grade II or grade III hemorrhoids and determine progression to hemorrhoidectomy based on age and the time interval between diagnosis and surgical intervention.
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study.
SETTINGS: Group practice at a single institution.
PATIENTS: Patients age 18-75 with grade II or grade III internal hemorrhoids between 2015 and 2020 were included. Patients with thrombosed hemorrhoids or surgical contraindications to hemorrhoidectomy were excluded. A total of 961 patients met inclusion criteria for Grade II (n = 442) and III (n = 519) hemorrhoids.
INTERVENTION: Treatments included hemorrhoidectomy, in-office procedures, and/or medical management.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Baseline demographics, treatment choices and time to hemorrhoidectomy (if applicable) were stratified and analyzed based on hemorrhoid grade (grade II and III) and age groupings that were pre-determined by the authors (18-30, 31-50, and 51-75).
RESULTS: Patients with Grade III vs Grade II hemorrhoids were more likely to choose hemorrhoidectomy as the initial treatment management (27.6% vs 4.1%). Patients in age groups 18-30 and 30-50 were more likely to choose hemorrhoidectomy as the initial treatment management compared to ages 51-75 years old (23.5% and 22% vs 12.8%). In patients who were initially treated with medical management or office-based procedures and then progressed to hemorrhoidectomy, no significant differences in length of time to hemorrhoidectomy were noted based on hemorrhoid grade or age.
LIMITATIONS: Data only looks at age groups and their treatment selection. Personal biases of surgeon and patient may alter results.
CONCLUSION: Our study shows that the younger population tend to seek hemorrhoidectomy first over the older population. See Video Abstract.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate patients with a diagnosis of symptomatic grade II or grade III hemorrhoids and determine progression to hemorrhoidectomy based on age and the time interval between diagnosis and surgical intervention.
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study.
SETTINGS: Group practice at a single institution.
PATIENTS: Patients age 18-75 with grade II or grade III internal hemorrhoids between 2015 and 2020 were included. Patients with thrombosed hemorrhoids or surgical contraindications to hemorrhoidectomy were excluded. A total of 961 patients met inclusion criteria for Grade II (n = 442) and III (n = 519) hemorrhoids.
INTERVENTION: Treatments included hemorrhoidectomy, in-office procedures, and/or medical management.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Baseline demographics, treatment choices and time to hemorrhoidectomy (if applicable) were stratified and analyzed based on hemorrhoid grade (grade II and III) and age groupings that were pre-determined by the authors (18-30, 31-50, and 51-75).
RESULTS: Patients with Grade III vs Grade II hemorrhoids were more likely to choose hemorrhoidectomy as the initial treatment management (27.6% vs 4.1%). Patients in age groups 18-30 and 30-50 were more likely to choose hemorrhoidectomy as the initial treatment management compared to ages 51-75 years old (23.5% and 22% vs 12.8%). In patients who were initially treated with medical management or office-based procedures and then progressed to hemorrhoidectomy, no significant differences in length of time to hemorrhoidectomy were noted based on hemorrhoid grade or age.
LIMITATIONS: Data only looks at age groups and their treatment selection. Personal biases of surgeon and patient may alter results.
CONCLUSION: Our study shows that the younger population tend to seek hemorrhoidectomy first over the older population. See Video Abstract.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app