We have located open access text paper links.
External Validation of the 2023 Duke - International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases Diagnostic Criteria for Infective Endocarditis.
Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 Februrary 9
INTRODUCTION: The 2023 Duke-International Society of Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) Criteria for IE were introduced to improve classification of infective endocarditis (IE) for research and clinical purposes. External validation studies are required.
METHODS: We studied consecutive patients with suspected IE referred to the IE Team of Amsterdam University Medical Center (October 2016-March 2021). An international expert panel independently reviewed case summaries, and assigned a final diagnosis of "IE" or "Not IE" , which served as the reference standard, to which the "Definite" Duke-ISCVID classifications were compared. We also evaluated accuracy when excluding cardiac surgery and pathology data ("Clinical Criteria"). Lastly, we compared the 2023 Duke-ISCVID to the 2000 Modified Duke Criteria and the 2015 and 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Criteria.
RESULTS: 595 consecutive patients with suspected IE were included: 399 (67%) were adjudicated as IE; 111 (19%) had prosthetic valve IE and 48 (8%) had cardiac implantable electronic device IE. The 2023 Duke-ISCVID Criteria were more sensitive than either the Modified Duke or 2015 ESC Criteria (84.2% vs 74.9% and 80% respectively, p < 0.001) without significant loss of specificity. The 2023 Duke-ISCVID Criteria were similarly sensitive but more specific than the 2023 ESC Criteria (94% vs 82%, p <0.001). The same pattern was seen for the Clinical Criteria (excluding surgery/pathology results). New modifications in the 2023 Duke-ISCVID Criteria related to 'Major Microbiological' and 'Imaging' criteria were most impactful.
CONCLUSION: The 2023 Duke-ISCVID Criteria represent a significant advance in the diagnostic classification of patients with suspected IE.
METHODS: We studied consecutive patients with suspected IE referred to the IE Team of Amsterdam University Medical Center (October 2016-March 2021). An international expert panel independently reviewed case summaries, and assigned a final diagnosis of "IE" or "Not IE" , which served as the reference standard, to which the "Definite" Duke-ISCVID classifications were compared. We also evaluated accuracy when excluding cardiac surgery and pathology data ("Clinical Criteria"). Lastly, we compared the 2023 Duke-ISCVID to the 2000 Modified Duke Criteria and the 2015 and 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Criteria.
RESULTS: 595 consecutive patients with suspected IE were included: 399 (67%) were adjudicated as IE; 111 (19%) had prosthetic valve IE and 48 (8%) had cardiac implantable electronic device IE. The 2023 Duke-ISCVID Criteria were more sensitive than either the Modified Duke or 2015 ESC Criteria (84.2% vs 74.9% and 80% respectively, p < 0.001) without significant loss of specificity. The 2023 Duke-ISCVID Criteria were similarly sensitive but more specific than the 2023 ESC Criteria (94% vs 82%, p <0.001). The same pattern was seen for the Clinical Criteria (excluding surgery/pathology results). New modifications in the 2023 Duke-ISCVID Criteria related to 'Major Microbiological' and 'Imaging' criteria were most impactful.
CONCLUSION: The 2023 Duke-ISCVID Criteria represent a significant advance in the diagnostic classification of patients with suspected IE.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
British Society for Rheumatology guideline on management of adult and juvenile onset Sjögren disease.Rheumatology 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Albumin: a comprehensive review and practical guideline for clinical use.European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2024 April 13
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app