We have located links that may give you full text access.
Rotational stability of a new hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens platform.
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2023 November 17
PURPOSE: To evaluate rotational stability in terms of ease of rotation of a new intraocular lens (IOL) platform with 4 haptics in an ex vivo model, and compare it with a control single-piece lens with 2 open loops.
SETTING: Intermountain Ocular Research Center, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
DESIGN: Experimental Study.
METHODS: 10 human cadaver eyes were prepared as per the Miyake-Apple technique. After injection of test or control lens, clockwise (CW) and counterclockwise (CCW) rotations were attempted with a hook, with and without ophthalmic viscosurgical device in place. Ease of rotation was scored as (1) very easy, (2) easy, (3) difficult, and (4) very difficult. Rotation of the entire eye containing test or control IOL was also carried out with a multi-purpose rotator (2 minutes;220 revolutions per minute) to evaluate its effect on IOL alignment.
RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences regarding ease of rotation between test and control lenses in all four scenarios, with rotation being more difficult with the test lens (P < .05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). No change in the alignment of test or control lenses was observed after eye rotation with the multi-purpose rotator.
CONCLUSION: The new IOL platform showed greater rotational stability than the control lens in this model, owing to design features such as four small arcs of contact between the haptics and the bag equator, a bulge at the distal end of each haptic, and arcuate haptics with curvatures oriented toward each other.
SETTING: Intermountain Ocular Research Center, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
DESIGN: Experimental Study.
METHODS: 10 human cadaver eyes were prepared as per the Miyake-Apple technique. After injection of test or control lens, clockwise (CW) and counterclockwise (CCW) rotations were attempted with a hook, with and without ophthalmic viscosurgical device in place. Ease of rotation was scored as (1) very easy, (2) easy, (3) difficult, and (4) very difficult. Rotation of the entire eye containing test or control IOL was also carried out with a multi-purpose rotator (2 minutes;220 revolutions per minute) to evaluate its effect on IOL alignment.
RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences regarding ease of rotation between test and control lenses in all four scenarios, with rotation being more difficult with the test lens (P < .05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). No change in the alignment of test or control lenses was observed after eye rotation with the multi-purpose rotator.
CONCLUSION: The new IOL platform showed greater rotational stability than the control lens in this model, owing to design features such as four small arcs of contact between the haptics and the bag equator, a bulge at the distal end of each haptic, and arcuate haptics with curvatures oriented toward each other.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 26
Intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine during the surgery to prevent postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European Journal of Medical Research 2024 April 19
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Ventilator Waveforms May Give Clues to Expiratory Muscle Activity.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2024 April 25
Acute Kidney Injury and Electrolyte Imbalances Caused by Dapagliflozin Short-Term Use.Pharmaceuticals 2024 March 27
Systemic lupus erythematosus.Lancet 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app