Exploring the Clinical Feasibility of Alternative Word-Understanding Measures for Autistic Children With Minimal Spoken Language.

PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study was to explore the clinical feasibility of using alternate word-understanding assessment modalities for autistic children who have minimal verbal skills. Specifically, assessment duration, occurrence of disruptive behavior, and no-response trials were examined across three word-understanding assessment conditions: a low-tech condition, a touchscreen condition, and a condition that used real-object stimuli. A secondary aim was to examine the relationship between disruptive behavior and assessment outcomes.

METHOD: Twenty-seven autistic children between the ages of 3 and 12 years who had minimal verbal skills completed 12 test items on the three assessment conditions. Repeated-measures analyses of variance with post hoc Bonferroni procedures were used to describe and compare assessment duration, occurrence of disruptive behavior, and no-response trials across conditions. A Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient was used to examine the relationship between disruptive behavior and assessment outcomes.

RESULTS: The real-object assessment condition took significantly longer than the low-tech and touchscreen conditions. Participants engaged in disruptive behavior most frequently during the low-tech condition; however, differences among conditions were not significant. There were significantly more no-response trials in the low-tech condition than in the touchscreen condition. There was a significant, weak negative correlation between disruptive behavior and experimental assessment outcomes.

CONCLUSION: Results show there is promise in using real objects and touchscreen devices to assess word understanding in autistic children who have minimal verbal skills.