We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Increased Corneal Ectasia Risk in Patients with Familial Mediterranean Fever.
Current Eye Research 2019 April
PURPOSE: To evaluate the corneal tomographic parameters in patients with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) and to compare data with those of healthy control subjects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty eyes of 40 patients with FMF (FMF group) and 35 eyes of 35 healthy subjects (control group) were included to this prospective study. All participants underwent complete ophthalmological examination and tomographic analysis with Pentacam HR. Maximum keratometry, front and back astigmatism, thinnest pachymetry, maximum anterior and posterior elevation best-fit-sphere (BFS) at the 5.0 mm zone, front and back difference elevation, final D, average and maximum pachymetric progression index, and maximum Ambrósio relational thickness parameters were noted.
RESULTS: Groups were similar in terms of age and gender (p = 0.77 and 0.35). Maximum keratometry, thinnest pachymetry, front and back astigmatism, and maximum anterior elevation BFS at the 5.0 mm values were similar between groups (p = 0.22, 0.52, 0.49, 0.29, and 0.31, respectively). Maximum posterior elevation BFS at the 5.0 mm and back difference elevation values were higher than control group in FMF group (p = 0.001 and 0.04). The mean values of final D, average and maximum pachymetric progression index were higher, and Ambrósio relational thickness was lower in FMF group compared to control group (p = 0.03, 0.002, 0.006, and 0.01, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: FMF patients carry increased corneal ectasia risk compared to healthy subjects. The corneal tomographic characteristics and the association of keratoconus with FMF may be important in a detailed refractive surgery work-up.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty eyes of 40 patients with FMF (FMF group) and 35 eyes of 35 healthy subjects (control group) were included to this prospective study. All participants underwent complete ophthalmological examination and tomographic analysis with Pentacam HR. Maximum keratometry, front and back astigmatism, thinnest pachymetry, maximum anterior and posterior elevation best-fit-sphere (BFS) at the 5.0 mm zone, front and back difference elevation, final D, average and maximum pachymetric progression index, and maximum Ambrósio relational thickness parameters were noted.
RESULTS: Groups were similar in terms of age and gender (p = 0.77 and 0.35). Maximum keratometry, thinnest pachymetry, front and back astigmatism, and maximum anterior elevation BFS at the 5.0 mm values were similar between groups (p = 0.22, 0.52, 0.49, 0.29, and 0.31, respectively). Maximum posterior elevation BFS at the 5.0 mm and back difference elevation values were higher than control group in FMF group (p = 0.001 and 0.04). The mean values of final D, average and maximum pachymetric progression index were higher, and Ambrósio relational thickness was lower in FMF group compared to control group (p = 0.03, 0.002, 0.006, and 0.01, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: FMF patients carry increased corneal ectasia risk compared to healthy subjects. The corneal tomographic characteristics and the association of keratoconus with FMF may be important in a detailed refractive surgery work-up.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults.Gut 2024 April 17
Systemic lupus erythematosus.Lancet 2024 April 18
Should renin-angiotensin system inhibitors be held prior to major surgery?British Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 May
Ventilator Waveforms May Give Clues to Expiratory Muscle Activity.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2024 April 25
Acute Kidney Injury and Electrolyte Imbalances Caused by Dapagliflozin Short-Term Use.Pharmaceuticals 2024 March 27
Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2024.Endoscopy 2024 April 27
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app