We have located links that may give you full text access.
Liver MR Elastography at 3 T: Agreement Across Pulse Sequences and Effect of Liver R2* on Image Quality.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology 2018 September
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of our study were to compare MR elastography (MRE) based on gradient-recalled echo (GRE) imaging with spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SEEPI) and rapid fractional (RF)-GRE MRE sequences at 3 T in terms of liver stiffness (LS) and image quality and to evaluate the effect of liver R2* on image quality.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-one patients underwent 3-T liver MRE with GRE, SE-EPI, and RF-GRE sequences performed in variable order in this study. LS and ROI areas on the LS 95% confidence maps were compared among the three sequences. The relationship between liver R2* and ROI area was investigated.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in mean LS among the three sequences (p = 0.49). Mean ROI area was significantly larger for RF-GRE (18,213 ± 9292 [SD] mm2 ) than for GRE (13,196 ± 8149 mm2 ) and SE-EPI (12,896 ± 8656 mm2 ) (p < 0.0001). Liver R2* was significantly higher among patients with one or more failed sequences (mean ± SD, 116 ± 76 s-1 ) than for patients with no failed sequences (59 ± 26 s-1 ) (p = 0.001). Technical failure rates were 10% (8/81), 4% (3/81), and 2% (2/81) for GRE, SE-EPI, and RF-GRE, respectively. Among patients with iron overload (R2* ≥ 100 s-1 ), there was a trend toward larger ROI area for SE-EPI (p = 0.09).
CONCLUSION: SE-EPI-and RF-GRE-based MRE sequences provide equivalent measures of LS compared with GRE-based MRE, and both have lower technical failure rates. The RF-GRE sequence yielded the largest measurable area of LS. Among patients with iron overload, there was a trend toward larger measurable area of LS for the SE-EPI sequence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-one patients underwent 3-T liver MRE with GRE, SE-EPI, and RF-GRE sequences performed in variable order in this study. LS and ROI areas on the LS 95% confidence maps were compared among the three sequences. The relationship between liver R2* and ROI area was investigated.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in mean LS among the three sequences (p = 0.49). Mean ROI area was significantly larger for RF-GRE (18,213 ± 9292 [SD] mm2 ) than for GRE (13,196 ± 8149 mm2 ) and SE-EPI (12,896 ± 8656 mm2 ) (p < 0.0001). Liver R2* was significantly higher among patients with one or more failed sequences (mean ± SD, 116 ± 76 s-1 ) than for patients with no failed sequences (59 ± 26 s-1 ) (p = 0.001). Technical failure rates were 10% (8/81), 4% (3/81), and 2% (2/81) for GRE, SE-EPI, and RF-GRE, respectively. Among patients with iron overload (R2* ≥ 100 s-1 ), there was a trend toward larger ROI area for SE-EPI (p = 0.09).
CONCLUSION: SE-EPI-and RF-GRE-based MRE sequences provide equivalent measures of LS compared with GRE-based MRE, and both have lower technical failure rates. The RF-GRE sequence yielded the largest measurable area of LS. Among patients with iron overload, there was a trend toward larger measurable area of LS for the SE-EPI sequence.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app