We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Review
Preoperative hormonal stimulation effect on hypospadias repair complications: Meta-analysis of observational versus randomized controlled studies.
Journal of Pediatric Urology 2017 October
INTRODUCTION: Preoperative hormonal stimulation (PHS) is commonly administered to improve hypospadias outcomes. However, current literature provides no clear evidence to support its use, and controversies exist regarding its effect on postoperative complications. Herein we systematically evaluate the effect of PHS on postoperative complications rates following hypospadias repair.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Comprehensive literature search performed on April 2016 including OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrials.gov, World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP), and ProQuest. Study quality assessment followed the Cochrane collaboration recommendation using risk of bias assessment, ROBINS-I and NOQAS. Effect estimates were extracted as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and pooled using Mantel-Haenzel method. Evidence quality was assessed using GRADE approach. Protocol Registration: PROSPERO CRD42016037881.
RESULTS: Twenty-one publications from 16 trials examining the effect of androgenic PHS on postoperative outcome were included. Subgroup analysis based on study design (including nine cohort studies with moderate to high risk of bias for patient selection) showed no significant difference on postoperative outcomes (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.95-1.81) (table). Pooled effect estimates with moderate quality of evidence from three randomized controlled trials suggest that significant lesser postoperative complications occur among patients exposed to PHS (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.20-0.65). Uniformly, the reported adverse effects related to PHS were mild and transient, with good overall tolerance.
CONCLUSIONS: Effect estimates generated from the better quality of evidence showed that PHS may decrease postoperative complications following hypospadias repair. Future studies should aim at identifying indicated subgroup of patients that will benefit from it and standardizing the dose and mode of delivery for best clinical result.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Comprehensive literature search performed on April 2016 including OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrials.gov, World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP), and ProQuest. Study quality assessment followed the Cochrane collaboration recommendation using risk of bias assessment, ROBINS-I and NOQAS. Effect estimates were extracted as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and pooled using Mantel-Haenzel method. Evidence quality was assessed using GRADE approach. Protocol Registration: PROSPERO CRD42016037881.
RESULTS: Twenty-one publications from 16 trials examining the effect of androgenic PHS on postoperative outcome were included. Subgroup analysis based on study design (including nine cohort studies with moderate to high risk of bias for patient selection) showed no significant difference on postoperative outcomes (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.95-1.81) (table). Pooled effect estimates with moderate quality of evidence from three randomized controlled trials suggest that significant lesser postoperative complications occur among patients exposed to PHS (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.20-0.65). Uniformly, the reported adverse effects related to PHS were mild and transient, with good overall tolerance.
CONCLUSIONS: Effect estimates generated from the better quality of evidence showed that PHS may decrease postoperative complications following hypospadias repair. Future studies should aim at identifying indicated subgroup of patients that will benefit from it and standardizing the dose and mode of delivery for best clinical result.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app