We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Review
A review and meta-analysis of corneal cross-linking for post-laser vision correction ectasia.
Journal of Current Ophthalmology 2017 September
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to review the safety and stability of cornea cross-linking (CXL) for the treatment of keratectasia after Excimer Laser Refractive Surgery.
METHODS: Eligible studies were identified by systematically searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and reference lists. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 12.1 software. The primary outcome parameters included the changes of corrected distant visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), the maximum keratometry value (Kmax) and minimum keratometry value (Kmin), the surface regularity index (SRI), the surface asymmetry index (SAI), the keratoconus prediction index (KPI), corneal thickness, and endothelial cell count. Efficacy estimates were evaluated by weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for absolute changes of the interested outcomes.
RESULTS: Seven studies involving 118 patients treated with CXL for progressive ectasia after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) (140 eyes; the follow-up time range from 12 to 62 months) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that there were no significant differences in Kmax and Kmin values after CXL (WMD = 0.584; 95% CI: -0.289 to 1.458; P = 0.19; WMD = 0.466; 95% CI: -0.625 to 1.556; P = 0.403, respectively). The CDVA improved significantly after CXL (WMD = 0.045; 95% CI: 0.010 to 0.079; P = 0.011), whereas UCVA did not differ statistically (WMD = 0.011; 95% CI: -0.055 to 0.077; P = 0.746). The changes were not statistically significant in SRI, SAI, and KPI (WMD = 0.116; 95% CI: -0.090 to 0.322; P = 0.269; WMD = 0.240; 95% CI: -0.200 to 0.681; P = 0.285; WMD = 0.045; 95% CI: -0.001 to 0.090; P = 0.056, respectively). Endothelial cell count and corneal thickness did not deteriorate (WMD = 12.634; 95% CI: -29.460 to 54.729; P = 0.556; WMD = 0.657; 95% CI: -9.402 to 10.717; P = 0.898, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The study showed that CXL is a promising treatment to stabilize the keratectasia after Excimer Laser Refractive Surgery. Further long-term follow-up studies are necessary to assess the persistence of the effect of the CXL.
METHODS: Eligible studies were identified by systematically searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and reference lists. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 12.1 software. The primary outcome parameters included the changes of corrected distant visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), the maximum keratometry value (Kmax) and minimum keratometry value (Kmin), the surface regularity index (SRI), the surface asymmetry index (SAI), the keratoconus prediction index (KPI), corneal thickness, and endothelial cell count. Efficacy estimates were evaluated by weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for absolute changes of the interested outcomes.
RESULTS: Seven studies involving 118 patients treated with CXL for progressive ectasia after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) (140 eyes; the follow-up time range from 12 to 62 months) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that there were no significant differences in Kmax and Kmin values after CXL (WMD = 0.584; 95% CI: -0.289 to 1.458; P = 0.19; WMD = 0.466; 95% CI: -0.625 to 1.556; P = 0.403, respectively). The CDVA improved significantly after CXL (WMD = 0.045; 95% CI: 0.010 to 0.079; P = 0.011), whereas UCVA did not differ statistically (WMD = 0.011; 95% CI: -0.055 to 0.077; P = 0.746). The changes were not statistically significant in SRI, SAI, and KPI (WMD = 0.116; 95% CI: -0.090 to 0.322; P = 0.269; WMD = 0.240; 95% CI: -0.200 to 0.681; P = 0.285; WMD = 0.045; 95% CI: -0.001 to 0.090; P = 0.056, respectively). Endothelial cell count and corneal thickness did not deteriorate (WMD = 12.634; 95% CI: -29.460 to 54.729; P = 0.556; WMD = 0.657; 95% CI: -9.402 to 10.717; P = 0.898, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The study showed that CXL is a promising treatment to stabilize the keratectasia after Excimer Laser Refractive Surgery. Further long-term follow-up studies are necessary to assess the persistence of the effect of the CXL.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults.Gut 2024 April 17
Systemic lupus erythematosus.Lancet 2024 April 18
Should renin-angiotensin system inhibitors be held prior to major surgery?British Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 May
Ventilator Waveforms May Give Clues to Expiratory Muscle Activity.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2024 April 25
Acute Kidney Injury and Electrolyte Imbalances Caused by Dapagliflozin Short-Term Use.Pharmaceuticals 2024 March 27
Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2024.Endoscopy 2024 April 27
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app