We have located links that may give you full text access.
Predictors of left ventricular systolic function recovery in the setting of sinus tachycardia in patients with cancer.
Echocardiography 2017 January
OBJECTIVES: To identify unique echocardiographic features that could be used to reliably predict LVEF recovery upon resolution of sinus tachycardia in patients with cancer.
BACKGROUND: Sinus tachycardia may be a manifestation of underlying cardiomyopathy or can lead to a reversible form of dilated cardiomyopathy known as tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy. While distinguishing the two can be challenging, predicting recovery regardless of cause can be of significant clinical importance in the cancer population.
METHODS: Results of echocardiograms performed were collected. Patients with a repeat echocardiogram within 6 months of the initial echocardiogram were included. Patients with structural heart disease, acute coronary syndrome, sepsis, and pericardial disease were excluded. A comparison between baseline echocardiogram and subsequent echocardiogram was made to determine whether specific echocardiographic parameters predicted LVEF recovery. Two groups of patients were defined at the outset of the study. The recovered group was comprised of patients with reduced LVEF in the setting of sinus tachycardia and normal LVEF with resolution of tachycardia to normal sinus rhythm (NSR). The unrecovered group was comprised of subjects with low LVEF in the setting of both sinus tachycardia and NSR.
RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were included in the study. LVEF in the recovered group (n=18) was 42.8% with sinus tachycardia and increased to 58.3% with NSR. Average LVEF in the unrecovered group (n=22) was 35.1% with tachycardia and improved to 38.5% with NSR. Medial TDI (E') was significantly greater in the recovered group with both tachycardia (7.95 cm/s versus 4.56 cm/s, P<.001) and NSR (8.11 cm/s versus 5.13 cm/s, P<.001). Similarly, lateral TDI (E') was significantly greater in the recovered group than in the unrecovered group during tachycardia (8.97 cm/s versus 5.13 cm/s, P<.001) and NSR (9.05 cm/s versus 5.13 cm/s, P<.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that medial TDI >6.5 cm/s (OR=30.9, P=.001) and lateral TDI >7.8 cm/s (OR=52.5, P=.002) are positively associated with the probability of LVEF recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, TDI (medial E'>6.5 cm/s; lateral E'>7.8 cm/s) appears to predict LVEF recovery in patients with sinus tachycardia upon resolution of the tachycardia in patients with cancer.
BACKGROUND: Sinus tachycardia may be a manifestation of underlying cardiomyopathy or can lead to a reversible form of dilated cardiomyopathy known as tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy. While distinguishing the two can be challenging, predicting recovery regardless of cause can be of significant clinical importance in the cancer population.
METHODS: Results of echocardiograms performed were collected. Patients with a repeat echocardiogram within 6 months of the initial echocardiogram were included. Patients with structural heart disease, acute coronary syndrome, sepsis, and pericardial disease were excluded. A comparison between baseline echocardiogram and subsequent echocardiogram was made to determine whether specific echocardiographic parameters predicted LVEF recovery. Two groups of patients were defined at the outset of the study. The recovered group was comprised of patients with reduced LVEF in the setting of sinus tachycardia and normal LVEF with resolution of tachycardia to normal sinus rhythm (NSR). The unrecovered group was comprised of subjects with low LVEF in the setting of both sinus tachycardia and NSR.
RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were included in the study. LVEF in the recovered group (n=18) was 42.8% with sinus tachycardia and increased to 58.3% with NSR. Average LVEF in the unrecovered group (n=22) was 35.1% with tachycardia and improved to 38.5% with NSR. Medial TDI (E') was significantly greater in the recovered group with both tachycardia (7.95 cm/s versus 4.56 cm/s, P<.001) and NSR (8.11 cm/s versus 5.13 cm/s, P<.001). Similarly, lateral TDI (E') was significantly greater in the recovered group than in the unrecovered group during tachycardia (8.97 cm/s versus 5.13 cm/s, P<.001) and NSR (9.05 cm/s versus 5.13 cm/s, P<.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that medial TDI >6.5 cm/s (OR=30.9, P=.001) and lateral TDI >7.8 cm/s (OR=52.5, P=.002) are positively associated with the probability of LVEF recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, TDI (medial E'>6.5 cm/s; lateral E'>7.8 cm/s) appears to predict LVEF recovery in patients with sinus tachycardia upon resolution of the tachycardia in patients with cancer.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults.Gut 2024 April 17
Systemic lupus erythematosus.Lancet 2024 April 18
Should renin-angiotensin system inhibitors be held prior to major surgery?British Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 May
Ventilator Waveforms May Give Clues to Expiratory Muscle Activity.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2024 April 25
Acute Kidney Injury and Electrolyte Imbalances Caused by Dapagliflozin Short-Term Use.Pharmaceuticals 2024 March 27
Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2024.Endoscopy 2024 April 27
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app