We have located links that may give you full text access.
Long-term results with the Biocor-SJM stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis.
Journal of Heart Valve Disease 2002 January
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The study aim was to update the clinical analysis of hemodynamic performance, structural failure and survival in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a composite aortic, aldehyde tanned, stentless porcine bioprosthesis.
METHODS: Between January 1990 and March 2001, 247 patients underwent AVR with aortic stentless valves. Patient demographic and clinical analysis included age, sex, valve lesion, valve size, pre- and postoperative NYHA class, hospital morbidity, mortality, operative data and duration of hospitalization.
RESULTS: Mean patient age was 47.3 years; 71% of patients were males, and 45% had aortic insufficiency. The incidence of rheumatic heart disease requiring surgery was 41.7%. In 23% of patients surgery was indicated due to aortic stented bioprosthetic dysfunction. Preoperatively, 81% of patients were in NYHA classes III and IV. Mean follow up was 5.9+/-2.8 years (range: 1 month to 11.4 years); total follow up was 1,392 patient-years (98% complete). The valve size used was < or =25 mm in 75.3% of patients. The mean intensive care unit stay was 2.6 days; mean hospital stay was 10.7 days. Hospital mortality was 4.0% and late death 6.1%. There were no valve-related deaths. Postoperatively, the mean aortic effective orifice area (EOA) was 1.71 cm2, the mean peak transvalvular gradient 17.1 mmHg, and the mean transvalvular gradient 9.0 mmHg; the left ventricular mass index (g/m2) was 174 and 117 before and after surgery respectively. The rate of leaflet tissue degeneration was 0.9%, and seen as mild by echocardiographic follow up. Actuarial survival at almost 12 years was 91%, and freedom from reoperations was approximately 99%.
CONCLUSION: Patients with aortic stentless valves have hemodynamic benefits seen as larger aortic EOA, low transvalvular gradients, satisfactory left ventricular remodeling with significant reduction of left ventricular mass, low complication rate, low reoperation rate, lower leaflet tissue degeneration rate, and no valve-related mortality. A longer follow up is required to confirm these benefits.
METHODS: Between January 1990 and March 2001, 247 patients underwent AVR with aortic stentless valves. Patient demographic and clinical analysis included age, sex, valve lesion, valve size, pre- and postoperative NYHA class, hospital morbidity, mortality, operative data and duration of hospitalization.
RESULTS: Mean patient age was 47.3 years; 71% of patients were males, and 45% had aortic insufficiency. The incidence of rheumatic heart disease requiring surgery was 41.7%. In 23% of patients surgery was indicated due to aortic stented bioprosthetic dysfunction. Preoperatively, 81% of patients were in NYHA classes III and IV. Mean follow up was 5.9+/-2.8 years (range: 1 month to 11.4 years); total follow up was 1,392 patient-years (98% complete). The valve size used was < or =25 mm in 75.3% of patients. The mean intensive care unit stay was 2.6 days; mean hospital stay was 10.7 days. Hospital mortality was 4.0% and late death 6.1%. There were no valve-related deaths. Postoperatively, the mean aortic effective orifice area (EOA) was 1.71 cm2, the mean peak transvalvular gradient 17.1 mmHg, and the mean transvalvular gradient 9.0 mmHg; the left ventricular mass index (g/m2) was 174 and 117 before and after surgery respectively. The rate of leaflet tissue degeneration was 0.9%, and seen as mild by echocardiographic follow up. Actuarial survival at almost 12 years was 91%, and freedom from reoperations was approximately 99%.
CONCLUSION: Patients with aortic stentless valves have hemodynamic benefits seen as larger aortic EOA, low transvalvular gradients, satisfactory left ventricular remodeling with significant reduction of left ventricular mass, low complication rate, low reoperation rate, lower leaflet tissue degeneration rate, and no valve-related mortality. A longer follow up is required to confirm these benefits.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
British Society for Rheumatology guideline on management of adult and juvenile onset Sjögren disease.Rheumatology 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Albumin: a comprehensive review and practical guideline for clinical use.European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2024 April 13
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app