We have located links that may give you full text access.
TEACHING STATISTICS ONLINE: COMPARING COMPETENCY-BASED AND TRADITIONAL LEARNING.
Teaching and Learning in Nursing : Official Journal of the National Organization for Assciate Degree Nursing 2024 January
BACKGROUND: Interdisciplinary undergraduate students are expected to develop statistical competence to interpret research findings as they advance in their healthcare studies and careers. However, students often report anxiety related to learning statistical course content.This descriptive study examined differences in statistical knowledge and self-efficacy scores of undergraduate students enrolled in online competency-based and traditional learning statistics courses.A sample of 20 nursing and interdisciplinary, undergraduate students from a Midwestern University who were enrolled in introductory statistics courses were recruited for this study.
METHODS: Significant differences between pre-test and post-test statistical knowledge and self-efficacy scores were compared for students receiving online competency-based learning and traditional learning statistical course content. The Current Statistics Self-Efficacy (CSSE) and the Self-Efficacy to Learn Statistics (SELS) measures determined the statistics self-efficacy scores.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference in knowledge scores from pre- to post-test in the areas of hypothesis testing ( p =.02), measures of central tendency ( p =.001), and research design ( p =.001), but there was not a significant difference in overall mean scores between competency-based learning and the traditional learning groups ( p =.10). The pre-test to post-test Current Statistics Self-Efficacy student scores improved significantly in both the competency-based learning (p <.001) and traditional learning (p <.001) statistics course sections; and the Self Efficacy to Learn Statistics pre-test to post-test scores were also significantly improved in the competency-based (p <.001) and traditional (p =.02) learning groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Both online competency-based and traditional learning methods improved interdisciplinary undergraduate students' statistical knowledge and self-efficacy scores. Online competency-based learning was described by the students as at least as beneficial as traditional learning for studying statistics while allowing more flexibility to repeat content until it was mastered.
PURPOSE: This study compared pre- and post-test differences in statistical knowledge and self-efficacy scores of students enrolled in online competency-based learning and traditional learning statistics class sections.
METHODS: Significant differences between pre-test and post-test statistical knowledge and self-efficacy scores were compared for students receiving online competency-based learning and traditional learning statistical course content. The Current Statistics Self-Efficacy (CSSE) and the Self-Efficacy to Learn Statistics (SELS) measures determined the statistics self-efficacy scores.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference in knowledge scores from pre- to post-test in the areas of hypothesis testing ( p =.02), measures of central tendency ( p =.001), and research design ( p =.001), but there was not a significant difference in overall mean scores between competency-based learning and the traditional learning groups ( p =.10). The pre-test to post-test Current Statistics Self-Efficacy student scores improved significantly in both the competency-based learning (p <.001) and traditional learning (p <.001) statistics course sections; and the Self Efficacy to Learn Statistics pre-test to post-test scores were also significantly improved in the competency-based (p <.001) and traditional (p =.02) learning groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Both online competency-based and traditional learning methods improved interdisciplinary undergraduate students' statistical knowledge and self-efficacy scores. Online competency-based learning was described by the students as at least as beneficial as traditional learning for studying statistics while allowing more flexibility to repeat content until it was mastered.
PURPOSE: This study compared pre- and post-test differences in statistical knowledge and self-efficacy scores of students enrolled in online competency-based learning and traditional learning statistics class sections.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Advances in Clinical Cardiology 2023: A Summary of Key Clinical Trials.Advances in Therapy 2024 May 15
Nutrition in the intensive care unit: from the acute phase to beyond.Intensive Care Medicine 2024 May 22
The Therapy and Management of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: New Insights on Treatment.Cardiac Failure Review 2024
Sodium-glucose co-transporter protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors for people with chronic kidney disease and diabetes.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2024 May 22
Bronchiectasis management in adults: state of the art and future directions.European Respiratory Journal 2024 May 24
Drug Therapy for Acute and Chronic Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction with Hypertension: A State-of-the-Art Review.American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs : Drugs, Devices, and Other Interventions 2024 April 5
Pathophysiological Link and Treatment Implication of Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.Biomedicines 2024 April 31
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app