Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Construct validation of a novel synthetic tendon model used for assessing surgeon performance in a simulated core suture tendon repair technique.

BACKGROUND: The strength of tendon repair is dependent on the quality of the core suture. Organic and synthetic materials have been used to simulate tendon repair for training; however, no model has undergone construct validation.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the construct validity of a novel synthetic tendon repair model.

METHODS: Synthetic silicone tendon models were used to simulate adult Achilles tendon (AT) and digital flexor tendon (FT). Participants were categorised into novice, intermediate, and advanced groups based on prior surgical experience. Participants repaired tendons using the modified Kessler technique. A validated motion analysis system was used to measure the duration, path length, and movement count during the simulated task. A global rating score was also used to assess the performance.

RESULTS: All participants in the novice (n = 12), intermediate (n = 8) and advanced (n = 11) groups completed the tasks. The results (mean±standard deviation) were duration (872 ± 335, 492 ± 257 and 357 ± 40 s), path length (9493 ± 3173, 6668 ± 1740 and 4672 ± 1228 cm), movement count (4974 ± 673, 4228 ± 259 and 3962 ± 69) and global rating (39 ± 13, 61 ± 14, 81 ± 5), respectively. The Kruskal-Wallis test was significant for all outcome measures (p < 0.01). Significant differences in duration and movement count were identified post-hoc in the AT model for each experience group (p < 0.05), and between novice and intermediate participants for FT repair (p < 0.04). Global rating was significantly different between all groups and was highly correlated with motion metrics (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION: The results support construct validity of this novel simulated tendon repair model. The global rating scores may allow wide utility of this simulation. This model provides a valid and safe environment for surgical trainees to practice tendon repair with several cost, ethical and logistical benefits over animal tendon use. 248/250.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app