We have located links that may give you full text access.
A Pilot, Randomized, Single-Blind, Controlled Study Evaluating the Use of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) for Hand Skin Rejuvenation.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2023 October 31
BACKGROUND: The presence of various growth factors in platelets makes platelet rich plasma a powerful tool in the stimulation of collagen regeneration in aging skin. The main objective of this study was to determine efficacy and safety of platelet rich plasma compared to saline solution in women with aging skin of the hands.
METHODS: In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, eighteen women with hand aging received PRP injections every 4 weeks into the unilateral dorsal hand for 12 weeks total; with saline injections into the contralateral hand in a randomized, controlled, single-blind fashion. Physician assessment, photographs and quality-of-life questionnaires were used for assessment at baseline; 12- and 24-week follow-up.
RESULTS: The majority of patients reported pain and discomfort along with a burning/stinging sensation in both PRP and saline treated hands with no significant differences noted in any patient outcome measures between the two treatments (all P≥0.25). No differences were reliably detected between the treatment hands by a blinded investigator comparing before and after clinical photographs of the hands.
CONCLUSION: Three injections of PRP spaced 4 weeks apart did not appear to be effective for treatment of aging skin of the hands in women, with no noted difference as compared with baseline, or saline injection. Although age > 45 years may be a factor accounting for non-response (i.e., subtle skin changes are difficult to appreciate, and possible limited platelet regenerative capacity in advanced age) it appears that PRP is not a reliable cosmetic option for management of hand aging.
METHODS: In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, eighteen women with hand aging received PRP injections every 4 weeks into the unilateral dorsal hand for 12 weeks total; with saline injections into the contralateral hand in a randomized, controlled, single-blind fashion. Physician assessment, photographs and quality-of-life questionnaires were used for assessment at baseline; 12- and 24-week follow-up.
RESULTS: The majority of patients reported pain and discomfort along with a burning/stinging sensation in both PRP and saline treated hands with no significant differences noted in any patient outcome measures between the two treatments (all P≥0.25). No differences were reliably detected between the treatment hands by a blinded investigator comparing before and after clinical photographs of the hands.
CONCLUSION: Three injections of PRP spaced 4 weeks apart did not appear to be effective for treatment of aging skin of the hands in women, with no noted difference as compared with baseline, or saline injection. Although age > 45 years may be a factor accounting for non-response (i.e., subtle skin changes are difficult to appreciate, and possible limited platelet regenerative capacity in advanced age) it appears that PRP is not a reliable cosmetic option for management of hand aging.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
British Society for Rheumatology guideline on management of adult and juvenile onset Sjögren disease.Rheumatology 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Albumin: a comprehensive review and practical guideline for clinical use.European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2024 April 13
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app