We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Significance of Myositis-Specific and Myositis-Associated Antibody Profiles in Dermatomyositis.
BACKGROUND: Myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSA) and myositis-associated autoantibodies (MAA) are clinically useful biomarkers that point to the diagnosis, clinical manifestations, and prognosis of dermatomyositis (DM).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: To estimate the prevalence of MSA as well as MAA and analyze possible clinical correlations of these autoantibodies in patients diagnosed with DM, we conducted a cross-sectional study of 30 patients who were diagnosed with DM.
RESULTS: MSA were positive in 19 patients (63%) in which Mi 2 was positive in 8 (27%) patients, and this was the most frequently found MSA. A total of 11 (36.7%) patients showed positive MAA. AntiPM/Scl 75 and anti-Ro 52 were positive in 5 (16.7%) patients each and these were the most commonly found MAA. Anti-La was absent in all our patients. There were 8 (27%) patients in whom both MSA and MAA were positive. Either MSA and/or MAA were positive in 22 (73%) patients. On a bivariate analysis, the patients who were positive for anti-PM/Scl 75 showed a significant difference in manifesting cutaneous ulcers ( P value 0.023). It was also found that anti-SAE-positive patients showed a significant difference with malignancy ( P value 0.014). Anti-Ro 52-positive patients were less likely to have symmetrical proximal muscle weakness ( P value 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: All patients who were anti-MDA 5 positive had myositis and none of the anti-MDA 5-positive patients had rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RPILD). More than one MSA in the same patient was noted in three patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: To estimate the prevalence of MSA as well as MAA and analyze possible clinical correlations of these autoantibodies in patients diagnosed with DM, we conducted a cross-sectional study of 30 patients who were diagnosed with DM.
RESULTS: MSA were positive in 19 patients (63%) in which Mi 2 was positive in 8 (27%) patients, and this was the most frequently found MSA. A total of 11 (36.7%) patients showed positive MAA. AntiPM/Scl 75 and anti-Ro 52 were positive in 5 (16.7%) patients each and these were the most commonly found MAA. Anti-La was absent in all our patients. There were 8 (27%) patients in whom both MSA and MAA were positive. Either MSA and/or MAA were positive in 22 (73%) patients. On a bivariate analysis, the patients who were positive for anti-PM/Scl 75 showed a significant difference in manifesting cutaneous ulcers ( P value 0.023). It was also found that anti-SAE-positive patients showed a significant difference with malignancy ( P value 0.014). Anti-Ro 52-positive patients were less likely to have symmetrical proximal muscle weakness ( P value 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: All patients who were anti-MDA 5 positive had myositis and none of the anti-MDA 5-positive patients had rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RPILD). More than one MSA in the same patient was noted in three patients.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 26
Intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine during the surgery to prevent postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European Journal of Medical Research 2024 April 19
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Ventilator Waveforms May Give Clues to Expiratory Muscle Activity.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2024 April 25
Acute Kidney Injury and Electrolyte Imbalances Caused by Dapagliflozin Short-Term Use.Pharmaceuticals 2024 March 27
Systemic lupus erythematosus.Lancet 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app