We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparison of mechanical thrombectomy techniques in an in vitro stroke model: How to obtain a first pass recanalization?
Journal of Neuroradiology. Journal de Neuroradiologie 2022 December 15
BACKGROUND: Since mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has proven to be effective in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), significant research has been dedicated to establishing procedural techniques offering best rate of first pass effect (FPE). In this study, we compared the efficacy of different techniques in vitro to achieve the first pass recanalisation (FPR).
METHODS: In vitro MT procedures were performed using a realistic silicone model of the human cerebral vasculature. The MT with stent retriever (SR) were performed with manual co-aspiration through the respective access catheter and intermediate catheter (IC), with Solumbra or partial retrieval techniques into the IC. Two SRs (Solitaire and EmboTrap) were selected to retrieve both red blood cells (RBC) rich and fibrin-rich clots. FPR rates were recorded for each case.
RESULTS: Overall, 144 MT were performed. FPR rates using the partial retrieval and Solumbra technique were of 100% and 87%, respectively (p = 0.01). The rate of FPR was of 92% using the balloon-guide catheter (BGC) compared to 64% with the guide catheter (GC) (p = 0.0001). With an IC, no differences were found between using a BGC or a GC (87.9% vs 89,6%, p = 0.75). No significant difference was observed between the Embotrap and the Solitaire device for the rate of FPR (82% and 74%, respectively; p = 0.23).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, FPR rates were higher with the use of an IC associated with the partial retrieval technique, regardless the guide catheter, the SR, or the clot composition. The less effective technique was the association of GC and SR, without an IC.
METHODS: In vitro MT procedures were performed using a realistic silicone model of the human cerebral vasculature. The MT with stent retriever (SR) were performed with manual co-aspiration through the respective access catheter and intermediate catheter (IC), with Solumbra or partial retrieval techniques into the IC. Two SRs (Solitaire and EmboTrap) were selected to retrieve both red blood cells (RBC) rich and fibrin-rich clots. FPR rates were recorded for each case.
RESULTS: Overall, 144 MT were performed. FPR rates using the partial retrieval and Solumbra technique were of 100% and 87%, respectively (p = 0.01). The rate of FPR was of 92% using the balloon-guide catheter (BGC) compared to 64% with the guide catheter (GC) (p = 0.0001). With an IC, no differences were found between using a BGC or a GC (87.9% vs 89,6%, p = 0.75). No significant difference was observed between the Embotrap and the Solitaire device for the rate of FPR (82% and 74%, respectively; p = 0.23).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, FPR rates were higher with the use of an IC associated with the partial retrieval technique, regardless the guide catheter, the SR, or the clot composition. The less effective technique was the association of GC and SR, without an IC.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 26
Intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine during the surgery to prevent postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European Journal of Medical Research 2024 April 19
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Ventilator Waveforms May Give Clues to Expiratory Muscle Activity.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2024 April 25
Acute Kidney Injury and Electrolyte Imbalances Caused by Dapagliflozin Short-Term Use.Pharmaceuticals 2024 March 27
Systemic lupus erythematosus.Lancet 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app