We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Dexmedetomidine prolongs the duration of local anesthetics when used as an adjuvant through both perineural and systemic mechanisms: a prospective randomized double-blinded trial.
BMC Anesthesiology 2022 June 8
BACKGROUND: To study the respective peripheral and systemic mechanisms of action of dexmedetomidine, as adjuvant to regional anesthesia, we compared dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine for mid-forearm nerve blocks, to either systemic-only dexmedetomidine, and to a control with no dexmedetomidine.
METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing hand surgery were randomly divided into three groups (n = 20 per group). Each group underwent a triple-nerve (median, radial and ulnar) mid-forearm blocks with 0.75% ropivacaine. In the DexP group, 60 µg of dexmedetomidine were added to the anesthetic mixture, while in the DexIV group, they were intravenously infused. Normal saline as a placebo was used, either as adjuvant, or intravenously. All patients underwent also a supraclavicular block with 1.5% lidocaine for tourniquet pain. The main outcomes were the duration of analgesia and the duration of sensory blockade separately for each nerve termination of the upper limb, and the duration of motor blockade of the upper limb. Tolerance was assessed by blood pressure and heart rate, and the report of adverse events.
RESULTS: Duration of analgesia was longer in the DexP group, in comparison to the two other groups (P < 0.001), while it was similar in the DexIV and the control group. For cutaneous territories targeted by the three mid-forearm blocks, the between-group differences behaved similarly. For the other cutaneous territories (musculocutaneous and posterior brachial cutaneous nerves), duration of sensory blockade was shorter in the control group than in the two dexmedetomidine groups. For duration of motor blockade, the between-group differences behaved similarly. Both blood pressure and heart rate were reduced in the DexP and the DexIV groups, compared to the control.
CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine used as an adjuvant to regional anesthesia may act mostly though a perineural mechanism, especially for the sensory aspects of anesthesia. A systemic action might however explain other clinical effects.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR-IOR-17011149 , date of registration: 16/04/2017.
METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing hand surgery were randomly divided into three groups (n = 20 per group). Each group underwent a triple-nerve (median, radial and ulnar) mid-forearm blocks with 0.75% ropivacaine. In the DexP group, 60 µg of dexmedetomidine were added to the anesthetic mixture, while in the DexIV group, they were intravenously infused. Normal saline as a placebo was used, either as adjuvant, or intravenously. All patients underwent also a supraclavicular block with 1.5% lidocaine for tourniquet pain. The main outcomes were the duration of analgesia and the duration of sensory blockade separately for each nerve termination of the upper limb, and the duration of motor blockade of the upper limb. Tolerance was assessed by blood pressure and heart rate, and the report of adverse events.
RESULTS: Duration of analgesia was longer in the DexP group, in comparison to the two other groups (P < 0.001), while it was similar in the DexIV and the control group. For cutaneous territories targeted by the three mid-forearm blocks, the between-group differences behaved similarly. For the other cutaneous territories (musculocutaneous and posterior brachial cutaneous nerves), duration of sensory blockade was shorter in the control group than in the two dexmedetomidine groups. For duration of motor blockade, the between-group differences behaved similarly. Both blood pressure and heart rate were reduced in the DexP and the DexIV groups, compared to the control.
CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine used as an adjuvant to regional anesthesia may act mostly though a perineural mechanism, especially for the sensory aspects of anesthesia. A systemic action might however explain other clinical effects.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR-IOR-17011149 , date of registration: 16/04/2017.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 26
British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults.Gut 2024 April 17
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Ventilator Waveforms May Give Clues to Expiratory Muscle Activity.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2024 April 25
Systemic lupus erythematosus.Lancet 2024 April 18
Acute Kidney Injury and Electrolyte Imbalances Caused by Dapagliflozin Short-Term Use.Pharmaceuticals 2024 March 27
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app