Do total shoulder arthroplasty implants corrode?

BACKGROUND: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) has become the gold-standard treatment to relieve joint pain and disability in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis who do not respond to conservative treatment. An adverse reaction to metal debris released due to fretting corrosion has been a major concern in total hip arthroplasty. To date, it is unclear how frequently implant corrosion occurs in TSA and whether it is a cause of implant failure. This study aimed to characterize and quantify corrosion and fretting damage in a single anatomic TSA design and to compare the outcomes to the established outcomes of total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS: We analyzed 21 surgically retrieved anatomic TSAs of the same design (Tornier Aequalis Pressfit). The retrieved components were microscopically examined for taper corrosion, and taper damage was scored. Head and stem taper damage was quantitatively measured with a non-contact optical coordinate-measuring machine. In selected cases, damage was further characterized at high magnifications using scanning electron microscopy. Energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy and metallographic evaluations were performed to determine underlying alloy microstructure and composition. Comparisons between groups with different damage features were performed with independent-samples t tests; Mann-Whitney tests and multivariate linear regression were conducted to correlate damage with patient factors. The level of statistical significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS: The average material loss for head and stem tapers was 0.007 mm3 and 0.001 mm3 , respectively. Material loss was not correlated with sex, age, previous implant, or time in situ (P > .05). We observed greater volume loss in head tapers compared with stem tapers (P = .002). Implants with evidence of column damage had larger volumetric material loss than those without such evidence (P = .003). Column damage aligned with segregation bands within the alloy (preferential corrosion sites). The average angular mismatch was 0.03° (standard deviation, 0.0668°), with negative values indicating distal engagement and positive values indicating proximal engagement. Implants with proximal engagement were significantly more likely to have column damage than those with distal engagement (P = .030).

DISCUSSION: This study has shown not only that the metal components of TSA implants can corrode but also that the risk of corrosion can be reduced by (1) eliminating preferential corrosion sites and (2) ensuring distal engagement to prevent fluid infiltration into the modular junction.