We have located links that may give you full text access.
Quantitative MRI in patients with gluteal tendinopathy and asymptomatic volunteers: initial results on T1- and T2*-mapping diagnostic accuracy and correlation with clinical assessment.
Skeletal Radiology 2021 November
OBJECTIVE: To determine if T1- and T2*-mapping of the gluteal tendons can discriminate between participants with and without clinical findings of gluteal tendinopathy (GT) and if they correlate with clinical assessment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted between January and December 2016. MRI of the hip included spin echo, short-T1 inversion recovery, variable-flip angle, and variable echo-time gradient echo sequences. MRI studies were reviewed independently by two radiologists. Two other readers segmented the gluteal tendons and T1, mono- (T2*m ) and bi-exponential T2* (short (T2*s ) and long (T2*l ) components) were computed.
RESULTS: Ten participants with GT (median age; interquartile range: 63 (57-67) years, all women) and 9 participants without GT (57 (55-59) years, 8 women) (P = 0.06) were enrolled. The sensitivity and specificity of reader 1 for disease classification were 40% (95% confidence interval (CI): 17-61%) and 70% (CI: 47-91%), and those of reader 2 were 70% (CI: 43-86%) and 80% (CI: 53-96%), with fair inter-reader agreement (Kappa = .38). T1 values could not discriminate between the two groups. The gluteal tendons T2*m and T2*s showed diagnostic accuracy ranging from .80 to .89. The posterior gluteus medius tendon T2*m and T2*s respectively showed sensitivity and specificity of 90%, and strong correlation (Spearman's rho = -.71; P = 0.02) with the Lower Extremity Functional Scale score.
CONCLUSION: Quantitative MRI could help gain new insight into healthy and diseased gluteal tendons to allow better diagnosis and treatment stratification for patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted between January and December 2016. MRI of the hip included spin echo, short-T1 inversion recovery, variable-flip angle, and variable echo-time gradient echo sequences. MRI studies were reviewed independently by two radiologists. Two other readers segmented the gluteal tendons and T1, mono- (T2*m ) and bi-exponential T2* (short (T2*s ) and long (T2*l ) components) were computed.
RESULTS: Ten participants with GT (median age; interquartile range: 63 (57-67) years, all women) and 9 participants without GT (57 (55-59) years, 8 women) (P = 0.06) were enrolled. The sensitivity and specificity of reader 1 for disease classification were 40% (95% confidence interval (CI): 17-61%) and 70% (CI: 47-91%), and those of reader 2 were 70% (CI: 43-86%) and 80% (CI: 53-96%), with fair inter-reader agreement (Kappa = .38). T1 values could not discriminate between the two groups. The gluteal tendons T2*m and T2*s showed diagnostic accuracy ranging from .80 to .89. The posterior gluteus medius tendon T2*m and T2*s respectively showed sensitivity and specificity of 90%, and strong correlation (Spearman's rho = -.71; P = 0.02) with the Lower Extremity Functional Scale score.
CONCLUSION: Quantitative MRI could help gain new insight into healthy and diseased gluteal tendons to allow better diagnosis and treatment stratification for patients.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
British Society for Rheumatology guideline on management of adult and juvenile onset Sjögren disease.Rheumatology 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Albumin: a comprehensive review and practical guideline for clinical use.European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2024 April 13
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app