Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Similar Pharmacokinetics of the Adalimumab (Humira ® ) Biosimilar BI 695501 Whether Administered via Subcutaneous Autoinjector or Prefilled Syringe (VOLTAIRE ® -AI and VOLTAIRE ® -TAI): Phase 1, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Trials.

INTRODUCTION: BI 695501 has shown similar efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity to the adalimumab reference product, Humira® . We present two phase 1 studies comparing the pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of BI 695501 delivered via autoinjector (AI) vs. prefilled syringe (PFS).

METHODS: Both trials were randomized, open-label, parallel-group studies undertaken in subjects aged ≥ 18-65 years. VOLTAIRE® -AI (NCT02606903) recruited healthy, Caucasian, male, non-athletic volunteers with BMI ≥ 18 to ≤ 30 kg/m2 . VOLTAIRE® -TAI (NCT02899338) recruited healthy men and women with BMI > 17.5 to < 35 kg/m2 . In both studies, a single dose of BI 695501 40 mg was administered via AI or PFS to the abdomen (VOLTAIRE® -AI) or thigh (VOLTAIRE® -TAI). The observation period was 43/57 days and the safety follow-up was 70 days. Co-primary endpoints were AUC0-1032 or AUC0-1368 , Cmax , and AUC0-∞ . Safety and immunogenicity were assessed.

RESULTS: Subjects (VOLTAIRE® -AI: N = 71; VOLTAIRE® -TAI: N = 162) were randomized to AI (n = 35; n = 81) or PFS (n = 36; n = 81). Baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment groups in each study. Total exposure of BI 695501 was similar for both groups; adjusted geometric mean ratios for AUC0-∞ , AUC0-1032 , and Cmax were 106.17, 104.09, and 114.83%, respectively, for VOLTAIRE® -AI; 103.19, 101.71 (AUC0-1368 ), and 100.11% for VOLTAIRE® -TAI. In both studies, similar immunogenicity was observed between groups in terms of frequency of binding and neutralizing anti-drug antibody-positive subjects. Incidence of adverse events was similar for both groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of BI 695501 delivered via AI were similar to administration using a PFS, independent of injection site. No differences are expected between AI and PFS use in clinical practice.

FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app