Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Head-to-head comparison of [ 68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT for the evaluation of tonsil cancer and lymph node metastases: a single-centre retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic value of [68  Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18 F]FDG PET/CT imaging for primary lesions and metastatic lymph nodes in patients with tonsil cancer.

METHOD: Twenty-one tonsil cancer patients who underwent [68  Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18 F]FDG PET/CT scans within two weeks in our centre were retrospectively enrolled. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) of the two tracers were compared by using the Mann‒Whitney U test. In addition, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the two methods for diagnosing metastatic lymph nodes were analysed.

RESULTS: In detecting primary lesions, the efficiency was higher for [68  Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT (20/22) than for [18 F]FDG PET/CT (9/22). Although [68  Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 uptake (SUVmax, 5.03 ± 4.06) was lower than [18 F]FDG uptake (SUVmax, 7.90 ± 4.84, P = 0.006), [68  Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 improved the distinction between the primary tumor and contralateral normal tonsillar tissue. The TBR was significantly higher for [68  Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT (3.19 ± 2.06) than for [18 F]FDG PET/CT (1.89 ± 1.80) (p < 0.001). In lymph node analysis, SUVmax and TBR were not significantly different between [68  Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18 F]FDG PET/CT (7.67 ± 5.88 vs. 8.36 ± 6.15, P = 0.498 and 5.56 ± 4.02 vs. 4.26 ± 3.16, P = 0.123, respectively). The specificity and accuracy of [68  Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT were higher than those of [18 F]FDG PET/CT in diagnosing metastatic cervical lymph nodes (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: The availability of [68  Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 complements the diagnostic results of [18 F]FDG by improving the detection rate of primary lesions and the diagnostic accuracy of cervical metastatic lymph nodes in tonsil cancer compared to [18 F]FDG.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app