Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Risk of cancers proximal to the colon in fecal immunochemical test positive screenees in a colorectal cancer screening program.

Gastroenterology 2024 April 31
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In more than half of the colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participants with a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) result, no advanced neoplasia (AN) is detected at colonoscopy. The positive FIT result could also be generated by cancers located proximal to the colon: upper gastrointestinal, oral cavity, nose and throat cancers. We evaluated screenees' risk of being diagnosed with a cancer proximal to the colon within the three years and compared risks between those with a positive versus those with a negative FIT.

METHODS: Data of Dutch CRC screening participants who underwent biennial FIT-based screening 2014-2018 were collected from the national screening database and linked to the National Cancer Registry. Screenees were classified into three groups: FIT-positives with AN (FIT+/AN+), FIT-positives without AN (FIT+/AN-) and FIT-negatives (FIT-). We compared the cumulative incidence of cancers proximal to the colon in each group three years after FIT. A Cox regression analysis with left truncation and right censoring, using FIT positivity as time-dependent variable and stratified for sex, was performed to compare the hazard of cancers proximal to the colon in FIT-positives versus FIT-negatives.

RESULTS: Three-year cumulative incidence of cancers proximal to the colon in FIT+/AN+ (n=65,767), FIT+/AN- (n=50,661) and FIT- (n=1,831,647) screenees was 0.7%, 0.6% and 0.4%, respectively (p<0.001). FIT-positives were older and more frequently male than FIT-negatives (p<0.001). Significantly more cancers proximal to the colon were detected among FIT-positives (p<0.001; hazard ratio 1.55, 95% CI: 1.44 to 1.67).

CONCLUSION: FIT-positive screenees were at significantly increased risk of being diagnosed with a cancer proximal to the colon within three years after FIT, though the three-year cumulative incidence was still less than one percent.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app