3D MODEL of an anatomically inert human hand: feasibility study.

OBJECTIVES: Surgery for congenital malformation of the hand is complex and protocols are not available. Simulation could help optimize results. The objective of the present study was to design, produce and assess a 3D-printed anatomical support, to improve success in rare and complex surgeries of the hand.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: We acquired MRI imaging of the right hand of a 30 year-old subject, and analyzed and split the various skin layers for segmentation. We created the prototype of a healthy hand, using 3D multi-material and silicone printing devices, and drew up a printing protocol suitable for all patients. We printed a base, comprising bones, muscles and tendons, with a multi-material 3D printer, then used a 3D silicone printer for skin and subcutaneous fatty cell tissues in a glove-like shape. To evaluate the characteristics of the prototype, we performed a series of dissections on the synthetic hand and on a cadaveric hand in the anatomy lab, comparing realism, ease of handling and the final result of the two supports, and evaluated their respective advantages in surgical and training contexts. A grading form was given to each surgeon to establish a global score.

RESULTS: This evaluation highlighted the positive and negative features of the model. The model avoided intrinsic problems of cadavers, such as muscle rigidity and tissue fragility and atrophy and enables the anatomy of a specific patient to be rigorously respected. On the other hand, vascular and nervous networks, with their potential anatomical variants, are lacking. This preliminary phase highlighted the advantages and inconveniences of the prototype, to optimize the design and printing of future models. It is an indispensable prerequisite before performing studies in eligible pediatric patients with congenital hand malformation.

CONCLUSION: The validation of 3D-printed anatomical model of a human hand opens a large field of applications in the area of preoperative surgical planning. The postoperative esthetic and functional benefit of such pre-intervention supports in complex surgery needs assessing.