We have located links that may give you full text access.
Genotypic and phenotypic antimicrobial resistance of Irish Clostridioides difficile isolates, 2022.
Anaerobe 2024 April 25
OBJECTIVES: Infection with Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) usually occurs after antibiotic treatment for other infections and can cause gastro-intestinal disorders of variable severity. C. difficile can be resistant to a wide spectrum of antimicrobials. Detection of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is important to direct optimal treatment and surveillance of AMR patterns in the overall population. Correlation between genotypic markers and phenotypic AMR is not yet well defined. The aim for this study is to assess whether and to what extent genotypic determinants of AMR correlate with phenotypic resistance.
METHODS: 99 C. difficile isolates were phenotypically characterized for resistance to eight antibiotics using Sensititre plates or E-tests. Their genomes were screened for genetic markers of resistance. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated.
RESULTS: We found high rates of resistance (>50%) to cefoxitin and clindamycin, intermediate rates of resistance (10% - 50%) to moxifloxacin and tetracycline and low rates of resistance (<10%) to imipenem, metronidazole, vancomycin, and rifampicin. For moxifloxacin, tetracycline, and clindamycin, we found a good correlation between genotypic and phenotypic AMR, with an overall accuracy of 96% (95% CI 90%-100%), 78% (95% CI 68%-86%) and 86% (95% CI 77%-92%) respectively. For the other five antibiotics, accurate estimates on the correlation could not be made.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that for moxifloxacin, tetracycline and clindamycin, phenotypic resistance in C. difficile can be predicted by genetic indicators and used for public health purposes. However, for the other five antibiotics, the model is not accurate and further development is necessary.
METHODS: 99 C. difficile isolates were phenotypically characterized for resistance to eight antibiotics using Sensititre plates or E-tests. Their genomes were screened for genetic markers of resistance. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated.
RESULTS: We found high rates of resistance (>50%) to cefoxitin and clindamycin, intermediate rates of resistance (10% - 50%) to moxifloxacin and tetracycline and low rates of resistance (<10%) to imipenem, metronidazole, vancomycin, and rifampicin. For moxifloxacin, tetracycline, and clindamycin, we found a good correlation between genotypic and phenotypic AMR, with an overall accuracy of 96% (95% CI 90%-100%), 78% (95% CI 68%-86%) and 86% (95% CI 77%-92%) respectively. For the other five antibiotics, accurate estimates on the correlation could not be made.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that for moxifloxacin, tetracycline and clindamycin, phenotypic resistance in C. difficile can be predicted by genetic indicators and used for public health purposes. However, for the other five antibiotics, the model is not accurate and further development is necessary.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Obesity pharmacotherapy in older adults: a narrative review of evidence.International Journal of Obesity 2024 May 7
SGLT2 Inhibitors in Kidney Diseases-A Narrative Review.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 May 2
Use of Intravenous Albumin: A Guideline from the International Collaboration for Transfusion Medicine Guidelines.Chest 2024 March 5
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app