Reusing Plasma Filters in Resource-Poor Settings: Experience From a Tertiary Care Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is used to manage various life-threatening illnesses. It is widely performed by nephrologists, intensivists, pathologists, or experts in transfusion medicine worldwide. However, the costs of TPE sessions are exceedingly high, and they have a huge impact on patients' financial burden. Herein, we investigated the outcomes of the reuse of plasma filters in TPE on several occasions.

METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of patients receiving TPE from January 1, 2020, to April 30, 2023, in the Department of Nephrology. A formulation of 4.5% peracetic acid and 24% hydrogen peroxide acid with RO water dilution was used for reprocessing. Clinical outcomes, risks, and cost-benefit were evaluated and compared between the plasma filter reuse group (GP-1) and the no-reuse group (GP-2).

RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were included in this study. 200 and 112 TPE sessions were performed in GP-1 and GP-2, respectively. The most common indication for TPE in both groups was neurological. The clinical efficacy of TPE was similar in both groups. There was no difference in the clotting of the plasma filter, any allergic reaction, infection, or bleeding in the group. However, there was a significant difference in levels of fibrinogen (p=0.03) pre and post-procedure in both groups. The incidence of hypotension was found to be higher in GP-1 (26%) compared to GP-2 (15.6%), p = 0.05. The cost of overall treatment was 38% less in GP-1.

CONCLUSION: The reuse of plasma filters is a safe and effective method for cost minimization in patients requiring TPE. This method can be effectively utilized in resource-poor settings without any increased risk of adverse effects.