We have located links that may give you full text access.
Educating for supported decision making and shared decision making: a scoping review of educational design and outcomes for education and training interventions.
Disability and Rehabilitation 2024 April 10
PURPOSE: To characterise existing knowledge about the design and learning outcomes of education and training programs for supported or shared decision making.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A scoping review was performed to identify academic and grey literature, published between January 2006 and February 2022, that reported on the design and/or learning outcomes of supported or shared decision making education or training programs. Eligible literature was mapped across domains of educational design and Kirkpatrick's hierarchy of learning effectiveness, and then qualitatively synthesised using cross-case analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 33 articles were identified ( n = 7 for supported decision making and n = 26 for shared decision making) that provided education or training to supporters of persons with mental illness or substance use disorders ( n = 14), dementia or neurocognitive disorders ( n = 6), cognitive disability ( n = 5), mixed populations ( n = 1), and those receiving end-of-life care ( n = 7). In their design, most programs sought specific changes in practice (behaviour) via experiential learning. Reported educational outcomes also focused on supporter behaviour, with limited evidence for how changes in learner attitudes, skills, or knowledge might be contributing to changes in supporter behaviour.
CONCLUSIONS: Future education and training would benefit from a closer engagement with theories of teaching and learning, particularly those oriented towards co-design.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A scoping review was performed to identify academic and grey literature, published between January 2006 and February 2022, that reported on the design and/or learning outcomes of supported or shared decision making education or training programs. Eligible literature was mapped across domains of educational design and Kirkpatrick's hierarchy of learning effectiveness, and then qualitatively synthesised using cross-case analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 33 articles were identified ( n = 7 for supported decision making and n = 26 for shared decision making) that provided education or training to supporters of persons with mental illness or substance use disorders ( n = 14), dementia or neurocognitive disorders ( n = 6), cognitive disability ( n = 5), mixed populations ( n = 1), and those receiving end-of-life care ( n = 7). In their design, most programs sought specific changes in practice (behaviour) via experiential learning. Reported educational outcomes also focused on supporter behaviour, with limited evidence for how changes in learner attitudes, skills, or knowledge might be contributing to changes in supporter behaviour.
CONCLUSIONS: Future education and training would benefit from a closer engagement with theories of teaching and learning, particularly those oriented towards co-design.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System: From History to Practice of a Secular Topic.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 5
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
British Society for Rheumatology guideline on management of adult and juvenile onset Sjögren disease.Rheumatology 2024 April 17
Albumin: a comprehensive review and practical guideline for clinical use.European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app