We have located links that may give you full text access.
Ultrasound-Based Predictive Model to Assess the Risk of Orbital Malignancies.
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 2024 April 4
OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound (US) is widely used for evaluating various orbital conditions. However, accurately diagnosing malignant orbital masses using US remains challenging. We aimed to develop an ultrasonic feature-based model to predict the presence of malignant tumors in the orbit.
METHODS: A total of 510 patients with orbital masses were enrolled between January 2017 and April 2023. They were divided into a development cohort and a validation cohort. In the development cohort (n = 408), the ultrasonic and clinical features with differential values were identified. Based on these features, a predictive model and nomogram were constructed. The diagnostic performance of the model was compared with that of MRI or observers, and further validated in the validation cohort (n = 102).
RESULTS: The involvement of more than two quadrants, irregular shape, extremely low echo of the solid part, presence of echogenic foci, cast-like appearance, and two demographic characteristics (age and sex) were identified as independent features related to malignant tumors of the orbit. The predictive model constructed based on these features exhibited better performance in identifying malignant tumors compared to MRI (AUC = 0.78 [95% CI: 0.73, 0.82] vs. 0.69 [95% CI: 0.64, 0.74], p = 0.03) and observers (AUC = 0.93 [95% CI: 0.90, 0.95] vs. Observer 1, AUC = 0.80 [95% CI: 0.76, 0.84], p < 0.01; vs. Observer 2, AUC = 0.71 [95% CI: 0.66, 0.76], p < 0.01). In the validation cohort, the predictive model achieved an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.94).
CONCLUSION: The ultrasonic-clinical feature-based predictive model can accurately identify malignant orbital tumors, offering a convenient approach in clinical practice.
METHODS: A total of 510 patients with orbital masses were enrolled between January 2017 and April 2023. They were divided into a development cohort and a validation cohort. In the development cohort (n = 408), the ultrasonic and clinical features with differential values were identified. Based on these features, a predictive model and nomogram were constructed. The diagnostic performance of the model was compared with that of MRI or observers, and further validated in the validation cohort (n = 102).
RESULTS: The involvement of more than two quadrants, irregular shape, extremely low echo of the solid part, presence of echogenic foci, cast-like appearance, and two demographic characteristics (age and sex) were identified as independent features related to malignant tumors of the orbit. The predictive model constructed based on these features exhibited better performance in identifying malignant tumors compared to MRI (AUC = 0.78 [95% CI: 0.73, 0.82] vs. 0.69 [95% CI: 0.64, 0.74], p = 0.03) and observers (AUC = 0.93 [95% CI: 0.90, 0.95] vs. Observer 1, AUC = 0.80 [95% CI: 0.76, 0.84], p < 0.01; vs. Observer 2, AUC = 0.71 [95% CI: 0.66, 0.76], p < 0.01). In the validation cohort, the predictive model achieved an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.94).
CONCLUSION: The ultrasonic-clinical feature-based predictive model can accurately identify malignant orbital tumors, offering a convenient approach in clinical practice.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 26
Intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine during the surgery to prevent postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European Journal of Medical Research 2024 April 19
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Management of Diverticulitis: A Review.JAMA Surgery 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app