Post-endovascular treatment, blood-brain barrier disruption, predicts patient outcomes better than pre-treatment status.

OBJECTIVES: Blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption is an important pathological change after cerebral infarction that exacerbates brain injury. We aimed to investigate and compare the predictive utility of pre-treatment BBB permeability (BBBP) and BBBP within 1 h after endovascular treatment (EVT) for hemorrhagic transformation (HT) and 90-day prognosis.

METHODS: Patients underwent preoperative computed tomography perfusion (CTP) and non-contrast CT (NCCT) within 1 h after EVT. Preoperative BBBP was determined by the relative permeability surface area product (rPS) in the hypoperfusion area. Postoperative BBBP was determined by the post-EVT Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (Post-ASPECTS), which is based on brain parenchymal hyperdensity on the postoperative NCCT.

OUTCOMES: We included 100 patients. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed correlations of preoperative rPS with HT, poor outcomes, and death. However, these correlations were not observed in multivariate logistic regression. A Post-ASPECTS ≤7 and could independently predict poor outcomes, while Post-ASPECTS ≤6 could independently predict death and HT. The baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score could independently predict poor outcomes and death but not HT. A combined model using the baseline NIHSS and Post-ASPECTS scores had better predictive performance for poor outcomes and death than baseline NIHSS score alone; however, it was not superior to the predictive performance of the Post-ASPECTS score.

CONCLUSION: The preoperative rPS cannot independently predict clinical outcomes in EVT-treated patients; contrastingly, the Post-ASPECTS score could independently predict poor outcomes, death, and HT. This parameter could inform prompt postoperative treatment decisions.