Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Protective effects of different lyoprotectants on survival of clinical bacterial isolates in a hospital biobank.

Cryobiology 2024 March 23
Nowadays the significant role of biobanks in medical, diagnostic, industrial, and environmental research is well known. Bacterial biobanks could be used as a good resource for designing new treatments, biomedical and industrial researches, and laboratory diagnostics. To have a collection of bacteria from clinical samples and maintain their long-term viability, their preservation needs appropriate protective agents, like cryoprotectants and lyoprotectants. In this study, we collected and characterized Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria carrying important antibiotic resistance markers from different clinical samples of hospitalized children. Sucrose (10%), skimmed milk (10%), skimmed milk plus sodium glutamate (10% + 1%), and bovine serum albumin (BSA, 10%) were used as lyoprotectants during the freeze-drying procedure. The survival rate of the lyophilized samples was calculated by dilution plating and measuring the colony forming unit (CFU) after 3 months of storage. The culture analysis results indicated that 25 of the 27 studied bacterial genera (Dilutions 10-3 to 10-6 ), including Shigella, Methicillin-resistant S. aureus, Acinetobacter spp., Escherichia spp., Pseudomonas spp., Klebsiella spp., Enterococcus spp., were recovered in cultured fractions from all preservation conditions, while 2 genera were only detected in a single preservation condition (2/27, 7.4%). Based on the results, sucrose (10%) and skimmed milk (10%) presented the most protective features. The survival rates varied significantly according to types of the bacteria. Collectively, our results showed a diversity in the recovery of different bacterial genera after lyophilization. While statistically no significant difference was detected among the studied protective agents, sucrose (10%) and skimmed milk (10%) exhibited more effective lyoprotective properties for both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria among the clinical isolates in our study.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app