Journal Article
Review
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Decompression alone versus interspinous/interlaminar device placement for degenerative lumbar pathologies: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

World Neurosurgery 2024 March 19
INTRODUCTION: Interspinous (ISD) and interlaminar devices (ILD) are marketed as alternatives to conventional surgery for degenerative lumbar pathologies; comparisons to decompression-alone are limited. The present study reviews the extant literature comparing cost and effectiveness of ISDs/ILDs to decompression-alone.

METHODS: Articles comparing decompression-alone to ISD/ILD were identified; outcomes of interest included general and disease-specific patient-reported outcomes (PROs), perioperative complications, and total treatment costs. Outcomes were analyzed at <6 weeks, 3-months, 6-months, 1-year, 2-year, and last follow-up (LFU). Analyses were performed using random effects modeling.

RESULTS: 29 studies were included in the final analysis. ILD/ISD showed greater leg pain improvement at 3mo (-1.43; [-1.78, -1.07]; p<0.001), 6mo (-0.89; [-1.55, -0.24]; p=0.008), and 12mo (-0.97; [-1.25, -0.68]; p<0.001), but not 2yr (p=0.22) or LFU (p=0.09). Back pain improvement was better following ISD/ILD only at 1yr (-0.87; [-1.62, -0.13]; p=0.02). SF-36 physical component scores nor ZCQ symptom severity scores differed between groups. ZCQ physical function scores improved more following decompression-alone at 6mo (0.35; [0.07, 0.63]; p=0.01) and 12mo (0.23; [0.00, 0.46]; p=0.05). ODI and EQ-5D scores favored ILD/ISD at all time points except 6mo (p=0.07). Reoperations (OR=1.75; [1.23, 2.48]; p=0.002) and total care costs (standardized mean difference 1.19; [0.62, 1.77]; p<0.001) were higher in the ILD/ISD group; complications did not differ significantly between groups (p=0.41) CONCLUSION: PROs are similar following decompression-alone and ILD/ISD; the observed differences do not reach accepted minimum clinically important difference thresholds. ISD/ILDs have higher associated costs and reoperation rates, suggesting current evidence does not support ILD/ISDs as a cost-effective alternative to decompression-alone.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app