We have located links that may give you full text access.
Outcomes for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with ascending aorta dilation.
International Journal of Cardiology 2024 March 11
BACKGROUND: We aim to compare the short and long-term outcomes for aortic stenosis (AS) patients undergone TAVR with and without ascending aorta dilation (AAD).
METHODS: Consecutive patients diagnosed with native severe AS who underwent TAVR from September 2012 to September 2021 were enrolled. They were stratified into the moderate/severe dilation group (greatest ascending aorta width ≥ 45 mm) and the non/mild dilation group. Survival outcomes were illustrated using Kaplan-Meier curves and evaluated with the log-rank test. Data from patients with CT follow-up of >6 months was used to investigate the progression rate of AAD.
RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 556 patients, with a mean age of 75.52 ± 7.30 years. Among them, 107 patients (19.2%) had a moderate/severe AAD (≥45 mm), with an average diameter of 48.58 mm (±2.82). During hospitalization, both groups witnessed two cases of ascending aortic dissection (1.8% vs 0.5%, P = 0.380). The median follow-up duration was 3.92 years (95% CI: 3.79-4.04 years). No deaths were caused by aortic events and no patients experienced a new aortic dissection. The AAD cohort's 4-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality rates were not significantly different to the non-dilation group's (log-rank test, P = 0.109 and P = 0.698, respectively). Follow-up CT data revealed that the rate of aortic dilation progression in the moderate/severe dilation group was not significantly different from that in the non/mild group (0.0 mm/year, 25-75%th: -0.3-0.2 vs 0.1 mm/year, 25-75%th: -0.3-0.4, P = 0.394).
CONCLUSION: This study found no significant difference regarding short-term and long-term outcomes in AS patients with/without moderate/severe AAD undergoing TAVR.
METHODS: Consecutive patients diagnosed with native severe AS who underwent TAVR from September 2012 to September 2021 were enrolled. They were stratified into the moderate/severe dilation group (greatest ascending aorta width ≥ 45 mm) and the non/mild dilation group. Survival outcomes were illustrated using Kaplan-Meier curves and evaluated with the log-rank test. Data from patients with CT follow-up of >6 months was used to investigate the progression rate of AAD.
RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 556 patients, with a mean age of 75.52 ± 7.30 years. Among them, 107 patients (19.2%) had a moderate/severe AAD (≥45 mm), with an average diameter of 48.58 mm (±2.82). During hospitalization, both groups witnessed two cases of ascending aortic dissection (1.8% vs 0.5%, P = 0.380). The median follow-up duration was 3.92 years (95% CI: 3.79-4.04 years). No deaths were caused by aortic events and no patients experienced a new aortic dissection. The AAD cohort's 4-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality rates were not significantly different to the non-dilation group's (log-rank test, P = 0.109 and P = 0.698, respectively). Follow-up CT data revealed that the rate of aortic dilation progression in the moderate/severe dilation group was not significantly different from that in the non/mild group (0.0 mm/year, 25-75%th: -0.3-0.2 vs 0.1 mm/year, 25-75%th: -0.3-0.4, P = 0.394).
CONCLUSION: This study found no significant difference regarding short-term and long-term outcomes in AS patients with/without moderate/severe AAD undergoing TAVR.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
British Society for Rheumatology guideline on management of adult and juvenile onset Sjögren disease.Rheumatology 2024 April 17
Albumin: a comprehensive review and practical guideline for clinical use.European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2024 April 13
Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System: From History to Practice of a Secular Topic.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 5
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app