Balanoposthitis in children: Analysis of treatment diversity and development of a treatment proposal.

INTRODUCTION: Balanoposthitis in boys with physiological phimosis is common. Publications on the topic are rare and literature provides no evidence-based guidelines on treatment efficacy. With this study, we aim to analyze treatments currently used, physicians' experience regarding the success and thus derive a treatment proposal.

STUDY DESIGN: An online questionnaire was created to evaluate practice patterns and experience. A case scenario, open questions and multiple-choice questions were used to allow multilayered answers. Pediatricians, pediatric surgeons, pediatric urologists, and family practitioners were invited to participate. Demographic data and answers to multiple choice questions were analyzed descriptively. Free text comments were analyzed quantitively by coding the text entries and identifying relevant themes. The themes were then grouped into categories.

RESULTS: Three-hundred-and-one data sets were analyzed. Predominantly, participants were from Germany and Switzerland, and most were specialized in either pediatrics or pediatric surgery. The analysis revealed a wide variability of treatments. Three main treatment forms were identified: baths, topical antiseptic treatment (wraps, gels), and topical antibiotics. Many participants use combinations of the above. Altogether, 53 treatment varieties and 27 categories were identified, including oral antibiotics and local irrigation. Treatment success was reported to be good for all treatment forms, baths were reported to be the best perceived treatment by the majority of participants.

DISCUSSION: The online questionnaire generated valuable data on the wide variety of treatment used for posthitis. The fact that all treatments are reported to be highly effective suggests that little is necessary to treat the condition or that it might even be self-limiting. Further studies will be needed to prove this conclusion. Until those are available, three main concepts should be considered when choosing a treatment: avoid (traumatizing) manipulation, apply antibiotic stewardship and adhere to families' preferences and feasibility.

CONCLUSION: We propose baths or local antiseptics, depending on the practitioner's and family's choice as the least invasive alternative. A prospective study to back our recommendation is scheduled.