We have located links that may give you full text access.
Implementation of sonopartogram: multicenter feasibility study.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 2024 March 9
OBJECTIVES: Well-established clinical practice to assess progress in labor involves routine abdominal palpation and vaginal examination (VE). However, VE is subjective, poorly reproducible and painful for women. In this study, our aim is to evaluate the feasibility of systematically integrating transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal position, psAOP, HPD and SCD to monitor labor progress in women undergoing induction of labor (IOL). We also aim at determining if ultrasound can reduce women's pain during examinations.
METHODS: Women were recruited as they presented for IOL in three maternity units. Ultrasound assessments were performed in 100 women between 37+0 and 41+6 weeks' gestation. A baseline combined transabdominal and transperineal scan was performed, including the assessment of fetal biometry, umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery Dopplers, amniotic fluid index (AFI), fetal spine and occiput positions, psAOP, HPD, SCD, and cervical length. Intrapartum scans were performed instead of VEs according to protocol. Participants were asked to indicate their level of pain by verbally giving a pain score from 0 - 10 (with 0 representing no pain) during assessment. The repeated measures data were analyzed by mixed effect models to identify the significant factors that affected the relationship between psAOP, HPD, SCD and mode of delivery.
RESULTS: 223 intrapartum ultrasound scans with a median of 2 scans per participant (interquartile range (IQR) = 1 - 3), and 151 VEs were performed with a median of 1 per participant (IQR = 0 - 2). There were no adverse fetal or maternal outcomes. After excluding those with epidural anesthesia during examination, median pain score for intrapartum scan was 0 (IQR = 0 - 1) and 3 for VE (IQR = 0 - 6). Cesarean delivery and epidural anesthesia were significantly associated with slower rate of change in psAOP, HPD and SCD. Maternal height, parity and neonatal birth weight did not affect ultrasound measurements of labor progress.
CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound assessment can be successfully used to assess progress in labor and can reduce the level of pain experienced during examination. Ultrasound assessment may be able to replace some transabdominal and VE examinations during labor. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
METHODS: Women were recruited as they presented for IOL in three maternity units. Ultrasound assessments were performed in 100 women between 37+0 and 41+6 weeks' gestation. A baseline combined transabdominal and transperineal scan was performed, including the assessment of fetal biometry, umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery Dopplers, amniotic fluid index (AFI), fetal spine and occiput positions, psAOP, HPD, SCD, and cervical length. Intrapartum scans were performed instead of VEs according to protocol. Participants were asked to indicate their level of pain by verbally giving a pain score from 0 - 10 (with 0 representing no pain) during assessment. The repeated measures data were analyzed by mixed effect models to identify the significant factors that affected the relationship between psAOP, HPD, SCD and mode of delivery.
RESULTS: 223 intrapartum ultrasound scans with a median of 2 scans per participant (interquartile range (IQR) = 1 - 3), and 151 VEs were performed with a median of 1 per participant (IQR = 0 - 2). There were no adverse fetal or maternal outcomes. After excluding those with epidural anesthesia during examination, median pain score for intrapartum scan was 0 (IQR = 0 - 1) and 3 for VE (IQR = 0 - 6). Cesarean delivery and epidural anesthesia were significantly associated with slower rate of change in psAOP, HPD and SCD. Maternal height, parity and neonatal birth weight did not affect ultrasound measurements of labor progress.
CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound assessment can be successfully used to assess progress in labor and can reduce the level of pain experienced during examination. Ultrasound assessment may be able to replace some transabdominal and VE examinations during labor. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
British Society for Rheumatology guideline on management of adult and juvenile onset Sjögren disease.Rheumatology 2024 April 17
Albumin: a comprehensive review and practical guideline for clinical use.European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2024 April 13
Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System: From History to Practice of a Secular Topic.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 5
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app