We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Review
Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence in Reducing Miss Rates of Gastrointestinal Adenomas, Polyps, and Sessile Serrated Lesions: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2024 January 5
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study aims to discern if the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) in the course of endoscopic procedures can significantly diminish both the adenoma miss rate (AMR) and polyp miss rate (PMR), compared to standard endoscopy.
METHODS: We performed an extensive search of various databases, encompassing, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus until January 2023. The search terms used were artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, transfer machine learning, computer-assisted diagnosis, convolutional neural networks (CNN), gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, endoscopic image analysis, polyp, adenoma, and neoplasms. Our aim was mainly to explore the impact of AI on the AMR, PMR, and sessile serrated lesion miss rate (SSLMR).
RESULTS: A total of 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled AMR was markedly lower in the AI group as opposed to the non-AI group (pooled RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.36-0.59, P<0.001). Likewise, PMR was also reduced in the AI group in contrast with the non-AI control (pooled RR: 0.43; 95% CI, 0.27-0.69, P<0.001). The results showed that AI decreased the miss rate of sessile serrated lesions (pooled RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20-0.92, P<0.05) and diminutive adenomas (pooled RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.26-0.93) during endoscopy, but no significant effect was observed for advanced adenomas (pooled RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.17-1.37, P=0.17). The average number of polyps (Hedges'g=-0.486, 95% CI=-0.697 to -0.274, P=0.000) and adenomas (Hedges'g=-0.312, 95% CI=-0.551 to -0.074, P=0.01) detected during the second procedure also favored AI. However, the AI implementation did not lead to a prolonged withdrawal time (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggested that AI technology led to significant reduction of miss rates for GI adenomas, polyps, and sessile serrated lesions (SSL) during endoscopy surveillance. These results underscore the potential of AI to improve the accuracy and efficiency of GI endoscopy procedures.
METHODS: We performed an extensive search of various databases, encompassing, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus until January 2023. The search terms used were artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, transfer machine learning, computer-assisted diagnosis, convolutional neural networks (CNN), gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, endoscopic image analysis, polyp, adenoma, and neoplasms. Our aim was mainly to explore the impact of AI on the AMR, PMR, and sessile serrated lesion miss rate (SSLMR).
RESULTS: A total of 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled AMR was markedly lower in the AI group as opposed to the non-AI group (pooled RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.36-0.59, P<0.001). Likewise, PMR was also reduced in the AI group in contrast with the non-AI control (pooled RR: 0.43; 95% CI, 0.27-0.69, P<0.001). The results showed that AI decreased the miss rate of sessile serrated lesions (pooled RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20-0.92, P<0.05) and diminutive adenomas (pooled RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.26-0.93) during endoscopy, but no significant effect was observed for advanced adenomas (pooled RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.17-1.37, P=0.17). The average number of polyps (Hedges'g=-0.486, 95% CI=-0.697 to -0.274, P=0.000) and adenomas (Hedges'g=-0.312, 95% CI=-0.551 to -0.074, P=0.01) detected during the second procedure also favored AI. However, the AI implementation did not lead to a prolonged withdrawal time (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggested that AI technology led to significant reduction of miss rates for GI adenomas, polyps, and sessile serrated lesions (SSL) during endoscopy surveillance. These results underscore the potential of AI to improve the accuracy and efficiency of GI endoscopy procedures.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Revascularization Strategy in Myocardial Infarction with Multivessel Disease.Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024 March 27
Intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine during the surgery to prevent postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European Journal of Medical Research 2024 April 19
The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 26
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
Management of Diverticulitis: A Review.JAMA Surgery 2024 April 18
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app