We have located links that may give you full text access.
Association of Glycemic Variability With Imaging Markers of Vascular Burden, β-Amyloid, Brain Atrophy, and Cognitive Impairment.
Neurology 2024 January 10
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the association between glycemic variability (GV) and neuroimaging markers of white matter hyperintensities (WMH), beta-amyloid (Aβ), brain atrophy, and cognitive impairment.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study that included participants without dementia from a memory clinic. They all had Aβ PET, brain MRI, and standardized neuropsychological tests and had fasting glucose (FG) levels tested more than twice during the study period. We defined GV as the intraindividual visit-to-visit variability in FG levels. Multivariable linear regression and logistic regression were used to identify whether GV was associated with the presence of severe WMH and Aβ uptake with DM, mean FG levels, age, sex, hypertension, and presence of APOE4 allele as covariates. Mediation analyses were used to investigate the mediating effect of WMH and Aβ uptake on the relationship between GV and brain atrophy and cognition.
RESULTS: Among the 688 participants, the mean age was 72.2 years, and the proportion of female participants was 51.9%. Increase in GV was predictive of the presence of severe WMH (coefficient [95% CI] 1.032 [1.012-1.054]; p = 0.002) and increased Aβ uptake (1.005 [1.001-1.008]; p = 0.007). Both WMH and increased Aβ uptake partially mediated the relationship between GV and frontal-executive dysfunction (GV → WMH → frontal-executive; direct effect, -0.319 [-0.557 to -0.080]; indirect effect, -0.050 [-0.091 to -0.008]) and memory dysfunction (GV → Aβ → memory; direct effect, -0.182 [-0.338 to -0.026]; indirect effect, -0.067 [-0.119 to -0.015]), respectively. In addition, increased Aβ uptake completely mediated the relationship between GV and hippocampal volume (indirect effect, -1.091 [-2.078 to -0.103]) and partially mediated the relationship between GV and parietal thickness (direct effect, -0.00101 [-0.00185 to -0.00016]; indirect effect, -0.00016 [-0.00032 to -0.000002]).
DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that increased GV is related to vascular and Alzheimer risk factors and neurodegenerative markers, which in turn leads to subsequent cognitive impairment. Furthermore, GV can be considered a potentially modifiable risk factor for dementia prevention.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study that included participants without dementia from a memory clinic. They all had Aβ PET, brain MRI, and standardized neuropsychological tests and had fasting glucose (FG) levels tested more than twice during the study period. We defined GV as the intraindividual visit-to-visit variability in FG levels. Multivariable linear regression and logistic regression were used to identify whether GV was associated with the presence of severe WMH and Aβ uptake with DM, mean FG levels, age, sex, hypertension, and presence of APOE4 allele as covariates. Mediation analyses were used to investigate the mediating effect of WMH and Aβ uptake on the relationship between GV and brain atrophy and cognition.
RESULTS: Among the 688 participants, the mean age was 72.2 years, and the proportion of female participants was 51.9%. Increase in GV was predictive of the presence of severe WMH (coefficient [95% CI] 1.032 [1.012-1.054]; p = 0.002) and increased Aβ uptake (1.005 [1.001-1.008]; p = 0.007). Both WMH and increased Aβ uptake partially mediated the relationship between GV and frontal-executive dysfunction (GV → WMH → frontal-executive; direct effect, -0.319 [-0.557 to -0.080]; indirect effect, -0.050 [-0.091 to -0.008]) and memory dysfunction (GV → Aβ → memory; direct effect, -0.182 [-0.338 to -0.026]; indirect effect, -0.067 [-0.119 to -0.015]), respectively. In addition, increased Aβ uptake completely mediated the relationship between GV and hippocampal volume (indirect effect, -1.091 [-2.078 to -0.103]) and partially mediated the relationship between GV and parietal thickness (direct effect, -0.00101 [-0.00185 to -0.00016]; indirect effect, -0.00016 [-0.00032 to -0.000002]).
DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that increased GV is related to vascular and Alzheimer risk factors and neurodegenerative markers, which in turn leads to subsequent cognitive impairment. Furthermore, GV can be considered a potentially modifiable risk factor for dementia prevention.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Revascularization Strategy in Myocardial Infarction with Multivessel Disease.Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024 March 27
Intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine during the surgery to prevent postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European Journal of Medical Research 2024 April 19
The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 26
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
Management of Diverticulitis: A Review.JAMA Surgery 2024 April 18
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app