Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Association of Glycemic Variability With Imaging Markers of Vascular Burden, β-Amyloid, Brain Atrophy, and Cognitive Impairment.

Neurology 2024 January 10
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the association between glycemic variability (GV) and neuroimaging markers of white matter hyperintensities (WMH), beta-amyloid (Aβ), brain atrophy, and cognitive impairment.

METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study that included participants without dementia from a memory clinic. They all had Aβ PET, brain MRI, and standardized neuropsychological tests and had fasting glucose (FG) levels tested more than twice during the study period. We defined GV as the intraindividual visit-to-visit variability in FG levels. Multivariable linear regression and logistic regression were used to identify whether GV was associated with the presence of severe WMH and Aβ uptake with DM, mean FG levels, age, sex, hypertension, and presence of APOE4 allele as covariates. Mediation analyses were used to investigate the mediating effect of WMH and Aβ uptake on the relationship between GV and brain atrophy and cognition.

RESULTS: Among the 688 participants, the mean age was 72.2 years, and the proportion of female participants was 51.9%. Increase in GV was predictive of the presence of severe WMH (coefficient [95% CI] 1.032 [1.012-1.054]; p = 0.002) and increased Aβ uptake (1.005 [1.001-1.008]; p = 0.007). Both WMH and increased Aβ uptake partially mediated the relationship between GV and frontal-executive dysfunction (GV → WMH → frontal-executive; direct effect, -0.319 [-0.557 to -0.080]; indirect effect, -0.050 [-0.091 to -0.008]) and memory dysfunction (GV → Aβ → memory; direct effect, -0.182 [-0.338 to -0.026]; indirect effect, -0.067 [-0.119 to -0.015]), respectively. In addition, increased Aβ uptake completely mediated the relationship between GV and hippocampal volume (indirect effect, -1.091 [-2.078 to -0.103]) and partially mediated the relationship between GV and parietal thickness (direct effect, -0.00101 [-0.00185 to -0.00016]; indirect effect, -0.00016 [-0.00032 to -0.000002]).

DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that increased GV is related to vascular and Alzheimer risk factors and neurodegenerative markers, which in turn leads to subsequent cognitive impairment. Furthermore, GV can be considered a potentially modifiable risk factor for dementia prevention.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app