We have located links that may give you full text access.
Upfront debulking surgery or delayed surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: Comparison of survival from a noncancer center in India.
Indian Journal of Cancer 2023 August 8
BACKGROUND: In advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) standard of care is upfront debulking surgery (UDS) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Interval debulking surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NACT-IDS) is a reasonable alternative.
METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of patients of Stage III/IV EOC treated either by UDS or NACT-IDS between January 2016 and December 2018 to report the comparison of progression-free survival(PFS) and overall survival(OS) of patients with advanced-stage EOC treated with either UDS or NACT-IDS.
RESULTS: Out of 50 patients, 19 (38%) underwent UDS, and 31 (62%) received NACT. The mean follow-up duration was 27.7 months. No gross residual disease was achieved in 52.6% of the UDS group and in 70.4% of the NACT-IDS group. The median PFS of 20 and 30 months was observed in the UDS and NACT-IDS groups, respectively (log-rank P = 0.054). The median OS was 36 months in the NACT-IDS group and could not be reached in the UDS group (log-rank P = 0.329). Only residual disease was significantly associated with survival (hazards ratio 3.03, 95% confidence interval: 1.19-7.74) on multivariate Cox regression analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: In advanced-stage EOC, the survival outcomes of NACT-IDS are comparable with those of UDS. Apart from the patient-specific parameters, the decision for UDS or NACT-IDS should take in account the expertise of the surgeon and the institutional capacity as a whole.
METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of patients of Stage III/IV EOC treated either by UDS or NACT-IDS between January 2016 and December 2018 to report the comparison of progression-free survival(PFS) and overall survival(OS) of patients with advanced-stage EOC treated with either UDS or NACT-IDS.
RESULTS: Out of 50 patients, 19 (38%) underwent UDS, and 31 (62%) received NACT. The mean follow-up duration was 27.7 months. No gross residual disease was achieved in 52.6% of the UDS group and in 70.4% of the NACT-IDS group. The median PFS of 20 and 30 months was observed in the UDS and NACT-IDS groups, respectively (log-rank P = 0.054). The median OS was 36 months in the NACT-IDS group and could not be reached in the UDS group (log-rank P = 0.329). Only residual disease was significantly associated with survival (hazards ratio 3.03, 95% confidence interval: 1.19-7.74) on multivariate Cox regression analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: In advanced-stage EOC, the survival outcomes of NACT-IDS are comparable with those of UDS. Apart from the patient-specific parameters, the decision for UDS or NACT-IDS should take in account the expertise of the surgeon and the institutional capacity as a whole.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System: From History to Practice of a Secular Topic.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 5
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
British Society for Rheumatology guideline on management of adult and juvenile onset Sjögren disease.Rheumatology 2024 April 17
Albumin: a comprehensive review and practical guideline for clinical use.European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app