Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A real-world comparison among third-generation antiseizure medications: results from the COMPARE study.

Epilepsia 2023 December 6
OBJECTIVE: There is little comparative data on the third-generation antiseizure medications (ASMs). We aimed to assess and compare the effectiveness of brivaracetam (BRV), eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), lacosamide (LCM) and perampanel (PER) in people with epilepsy (PWE). Efficacy and tolerability were compared as secondary objectives.

METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective study collecting data from 22 Italian neurology/epilepsy centres. All adult PWE who started add-on treatment with one of the studied ASMs between January 2018 and October 2021 were included. Retention rate was established as effectiveness measure and described using Kaplan-Meier curves and the best fitting survival model. The responder status and the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) were used to evaluate efficacy and safety, respectively. The odds of AEs and drug-efficacy were estimated by two multilevel logistic models.

RESULTS: 960 patients (52.92% females, median age 43 years) met the inclusion criteria. They mainly suffered from structural epilepsy (52.29%) with monthly (46.2%) focal seizures (69.58%). Compared with LCM, all the studied ASMs had a higher drop-out risk, statistically significant in the BRV levetiracetam (LEV)-naïve (HR: 1.97; 95% CI: 1.17-3.29) and PER groups (HR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.06-2.55). Women were at higher risk of discontinuing ESL (HR: 5.33; 95% CI: 1.71-16.61), as well as PER-treated patients with unknown epilepsy aetiology vs those with structural aetiology (HR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.05-2.88). BRV with prior LEV therapy showed lower odds of efficacy (OR: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.01-0.48) vs LCM, whilst a higher efficacy was observed in women treated with BRV and LEV-naïve (OR: 10.32; 95% CI: 1.55-68.78) vs men. PER (OR: 6.93; 95% CI: 3.32-14.44) and BRV in LEV-naïve patients (OR: 6.80; 95% CI: 2.64-17.52) had a higher chance of AEs than LCM.

SIGNIFICANCE: Comparative evidence from real-world studies may help clinicians to tailor treatments according to patients' demographic and clinical characteristics.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app