We have located links that may give you full text access.
Effect of vault on predicting postoperative refractive error for posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens based on a machine learning model.
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2023 November 8
PURPOSE: To investigate how vault and other biometric variations affect postoperative refractive error of implantable collamer lenses(ICL) by integrating artificial intelligence(AI) and modified vergence formula.
SETTING: Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University (EENT FDU, Shanghai, China).
DESIGN: Artificial intelligence and big data based prediction model.
METHODS: We included 2845 eyes who underwent uneventful spherical ICL or toric ICL implantation at EENT FDU, and with manifest refraction results one month after surgery. One eye of each patient was randomly included.Random Forest was used to calculate the postoperative sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent by inputting variable ocular parameters. The influence of predicted vault and modified Holladay formula on predicting postoperative refractive error was analyzed. Subgroup analysis of ideal vault(0.25-0.75mm) and extreme vault(<0.25 mm, or >0.75 mm) was performed.
RESULTS: In the test set of both ICLs, all the random forest-based models significantly improved accuracy of predicting postoperative sphere compared to the OCOS calculator(P<0.001). For ideal vault, combination of modified Holladay formula in spherical ICL exhibited highest accuracy(R=0.606). For extreme vault, combination of predicted vault in spherical ICL enhanced R values (R=0.864). Combination of predicted vault and modified Holladay formula was most optimal for toric ICL in all ranges of vault (ideal vault: R=0.516, extreme vault,R=0.334).
CONCLUSION: Our random forest-based calculator, considering vault and variable ocular parameters, illustrated superiority over the existing calculator on our datasets. Choosing an appropriate lens size to control the vault within the ideal range is helpful to avoid refractive surprises.
SETTING: Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University (EENT FDU, Shanghai, China).
DESIGN: Artificial intelligence and big data based prediction model.
METHODS: We included 2845 eyes who underwent uneventful spherical ICL or toric ICL implantation at EENT FDU, and with manifest refraction results one month after surgery. One eye of each patient was randomly included.Random Forest was used to calculate the postoperative sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent by inputting variable ocular parameters. The influence of predicted vault and modified Holladay formula on predicting postoperative refractive error was analyzed. Subgroup analysis of ideal vault(0.25-0.75mm) and extreme vault(<0.25 mm, or >0.75 mm) was performed.
RESULTS: In the test set of both ICLs, all the random forest-based models significantly improved accuracy of predicting postoperative sphere compared to the OCOS calculator(P<0.001). For ideal vault, combination of modified Holladay formula in spherical ICL exhibited highest accuracy(R=0.606). For extreme vault, combination of predicted vault in spherical ICL enhanced R values (R=0.864). Combination of predicted vault and modified Holladay formula was most optimal for toric ICL in all ranges of vault (ideal vault: R=0.516, extreme vault,R=0.334).
CONCLUSION: Our random forest-based calculator, considering vault and variable ocular parameters, illustrated superiority over the existing calculator on our datasets. Choosing an appropriate lens size to control the vault within the ideal range is helpful to avoid refractive surprises.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System: From History to Practice of a Secular Topic.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 5
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
British Society for Rheumatology guideline on management of adult and juvenile onset Sjögren disease.Rheumatology 2024 April 17
Albumin: a comprehensive review and practical guideline for clinical use.European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app