Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Does Length of Extended Resection Beyond Transition Zone Change Clinical Outcome for Hirschsprung Pull-Through?

INTRODUCTION: A proximal resection margin greater than 5 cm from the intra-operative histologically determined transition zone has been deemed necessary to minimize the risk of transition zone pull-through. This extended resection may require the sacrifice of vascular supply and even further bowel resection. The impact of extended proximal resection margin on post-operative complications and functional outcomes is unclear.

METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent primary pull-through for Hirschsprung disease at a single institution between January 2008 and December 2022 was performed. An adequate proximal margin was defined by a circumferential normally ganglionated ring and absence of hypertrophic nerves. The extended margin was defined as the total length of proximal colon with normal ganglion cells and without hypertrophic nerves. Fecal incontinence severity was assessed with the Pediatric Fecal Incontinence Severity Score (PFISS).

RESULTS: Eighty seven patients met criteria for inclusion. Median age at primary pull-through was 17 days (IQR 10-92 days), 55% (n = 48) of patients had an extended proximal margin (EPM) ≤ 5 cm, and 45% (n = 39) had an EPM > 5 cm. An EPM ≤5 cm was not associated with increased rates of Hirschsprung associated enterocolitis (≤5 cm 43%, >5 cm 39%, P = 0.701), diversion post pull-through (≤5 cm 10%, >5 cm 5%, P = 0.367) or reoperation for transition zone pull-through (≤5 cm 3%, >5 cm 0%, P = 0.112). EPM ≤5 cm had more frequent involuntary daytime bowel movements (P = 0.041) and more frequent voluntary bowel movements (P = 0.035). There were no differences in other measures of fecal incontinence severity.

CONCLUSIONS: Shorter proximal extended margins beyond the adequate ganglionated margin do not significantly impact post-operative complication rates and have an unclear effect on fecal incontinence.

TYPE OF STUDY: Case Control.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app