Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

H2H Standardized Nutritional Support Management Mode Improves Nutritional Status of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Receiving Radiotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Study.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): Malnutrition which occurs in 90% patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). It may lead to inferior efficacy of antitumor treatment, increasing the adverse effects and reducing the quality of life. Several studies reported that hospital to home (H2H) standardized nutritional support management mode improved the nutritional status of patients with HNC during CCRT. However, these published studies were limited by retrospective data and small sample size. This randomized controlled study aimed to explore the improving nutritional status efficacy of H2H whole-course standardized nutritional support management mode in patients with HNC receiving CCRT.

MATERIALS/METHODS: From March 2021 to September 2021, patients with HNC receiving CCRT were randomly assigned into H2H nutrition management group (H2H group) and Routine nutritional management group (RTM group) in a 1:1 ratio. For H2H group, patients not only received individual nutritional management which was formulated by doctors, nutritionists and nutrition nurses from the hospital to the family at least once a week, but also received education of nutrition from network platforms. For RTM group, doctors and nurses made nutrition therapy according to nutritional status of patients. The primary endpoints of this study were nutritional status including weight, BMI, albumin, and hemoglobin. This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University (Ethics Committee Approval Number: KY20222067-F-1).

RESULTS: A total of 60 patients were enrolled in this study. Patient characteristics were well balanced in both arms. Compared with RTM group, patients in H2H group had better nutritional status as below: body weight (62.33±4.37) vs (60.14±4.56) kg, P = 0.037; BMI (21.84±3.01) vs (19.70±2.95) kg/m2 , P = 0.033; Alb (39.25±2.17) vs (37.02±2.69) g/L, P = 0.031; Hb (132.7±9.03) vs (125.3±9.28) g/L, P = 0.039. The incidence of grade 3-4 oral mucositis in H2H group was less than RTM group (26% vs. 70%, P = 0.038). The score of quality of life was higher in H2H group compared RTM group (85.60±3.40 vs. 73.48±3.61, P = 0.000). The rate of nursing satisfaction in H2H group was higher than RTM group. Pre- and post-intervention satisfaction was 73.33% and 96.67%, respectively (p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION: H2H standardized nutritional support management model improve nutritional status, quality of life and rate of nursing satisfaction in patients with HNC receiving CCRT.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app