Validity of the Center-Center Method for the Syndesmotic Fixation Axis Compared to the Transsyndesmotic Axis.

BACKGROUND: Placement of clamp forceps along the transsyndesmotic (TS) axis reduces the risk of iatrogenic syndesmotic malreduction during ankle fracture surgery with tibiofibular diastasis. This study aimed to measure the difference between the TS axis and the axis determined by an intraoperative fluoroscopic technique using the center-center (CC) method. We also compared the values obtained when the CC method was performed at different heights from the tibial plafond.

METHODS: We evaluated the computed tomography scans of 150 patients with normal syndesmosis. The CC method was simulated using digitally reconstructed radiographs. The TS and CC axes were projected onto an axial computed tomographic image linked to digitally reconstructed radiography. The angle between the two axes (interaxis angle) and the distance between the intersection of these axes and the medial tibial cortex (interaxis distance) were measured. The procedures were performed 0, 10, and 20 mm proximal to the tibial plafond, and the measurements were compared among the different heights using a 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance.

RESULTS: The TS axis was found to be externally rotated to the CC axis, with an interaxis angle of 8.5 degrees (SD, 6.8 degrees). The interaxis angle increased from 1.9 degrees at a height of 0 mm to a greater angle at higher heights ( P  < .001). The overall interaxis distance was 7.7 (SD, 6.3) mm, increasing from 2.0 mm at a height of 0 mm to a greater distance at higher heights ( P  < .001).

CONCLUSION: The TS axis was externally rotated relative to the CC axis, and the difference between the 2 axes was greater when the CC method was performed on the higher heights from the tibial plafond. To clamp the syndesmosis along the TS axis, the CC method should be applied close to the ankle joint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.