Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate with Prolene (4-0) Sutures in Extra Oral Wound Closure.

AIM: To compare the healing following various maxillofacial incisions using 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (2-OCA) and prolene (4-0) sutures.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the complications and aesthetic outcome of the incision wounds after closure using 2-OCA and prolene (4-0) sutures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patient undergoing an extraoral incision was evaluated for pain, inflammation, infection, dehiscence, scar, and surface texture. In Group I, 15 patient incisions were closed with 2-OCA and in Group II, 15 patient incisions were closed with prolene (4-0) suture.

RESULT: A few patients experienced pain with Group I and then Group II, but infection, inflammation, and dehiscence were more in Group I than in Group II.

CONCLUSION: A cosmetic outcome was higher in the cyanoacrylate group, and the surface texture was satisfying in the same group.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app