We have located links that may give you full text access.
Reliability of Intraocular Pressure Measurements in a Low Contact Drive-Through Setting.
Journal of Glaucoma 2023 August 26
PRCIS: Drive-through IOP measurement using iCare tonometry is a promising method of low-contact, high-throughput IOP monitoring. However, owing to its vulnerability to variable measurement technique and local air currents, the iCare may overestimate IOPs.
PURPOSE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, a drive-through intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement protocol using the iCare tonometer was established to facilitate low-contact monitoring of select glaucoma patients.1 As the iCare may be prone to error due to variable measurement technique and local air currents,2 we endeavored to assess the reliability of drive-through IOP measurements by comparing them with recent measurements taken in clinic settings.
METHODS: Inclusion criteria were patients with drive-through IOP measurements performed from Apr 28-Oct 11, 2020; exclusion criteria were pre-drive-through IOPs >21 mmHg. Drive-through IOP measurements were compared with the closest previous and/or subsequent in-clinic IOP measurements. Data was gathered using the Sight Outcomes Research Collaborative (SOURCE) data repository.3.
RESULTS: The post-exclusion study group consisted of 314 patients receiving a total of 868 drive-through IOP measurements, all of whom had prior in-clinic measurements, and 56.8% of whom had subsequent in-clinic measurements. Drive-through IOPs were, on average, +2.4 mmHg (+14.5%; SD 4.9) higher than in-clinic IOPs. Further sub-analysis of the data showed a difference of +2.1 mmHg OD and +2.6 mmHg OS. Compared to the closest previous in-clinic visit, the difference was +2.4 mmHg OU (+2.1 mmHg OD, +2.7 mmHg OS); compared to the closest subsequent in-clinic visit, the difference was +2.3 mmHg OU (+2.1 mmHg OD, +2.5 mmHg OS). 68.6% of all drive-through IOPs were higher than corresponding in-clinic IOPs; 21.1% were lower. 25.9% of drive-through IOPs were higher by more than 5 mmHg, while 3.9% of drive-through IOPs were lower by more than 5 mmHg.
DISCUSSION: As teleophthalmology becomes an ever more important tool in glaucoma patient care, drive-through or walk-through IOP monitoring methods are likely to play an increasing role. However, our data reveals potential inaccuracies in drive-through iCare IOP measurements which tend to overestimate IOP. It is advisable to confirm large changes in IOP with in-clinic measurement prior to making management decisions.
CONCLUSION: With better optimization of accuracy and reliability of measurements, drive-through tonometry is a promising, high-throughput, low-contact method of measuring IOP.
PURPOSE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, a drive-through intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement protocol using the iCare tonometer was established to facilitate low-contact monitoring of select glaucoma patients.1 As the iCare may be prone to error due to variable measurement technique and local air currents,2 we endeavored to assess the reliability of drive-through IOP measurements by comparing them with recent measurements taken in clinic settings.
METHODS: Inclusion criteria were patients with drive-through IOP measurements performed from Apr 28-Oct 11, 2020; exclusion criteria were pre-drive-through IOPs >21 mmHg. Drive-through IOP measurements were compared with the closest previous and/or subsequent in-clinic IOP measurements. Data was gathered using the Sight Outcomes Research Collaborative (SOURCE) data repository.3.
RESULTS: The post-exclusion study group consisted of 314 patients receiving a total of 868 drive-through IOP measurements, all of whom had prior in-clinic measurements, and 56.8% of whom had subsequent in-clinic measurements. Drive-through IOPs were, on average, +2.4 mmHg (+14.5%; SD 4.9) higher than in-clinic IOPs. Further sub-analysis of the data showed a difference of +2.1 mmHg OD and +2.6 mmHg OS. Compared to the closest previous in-clinic visit, the difference was +2.4 mmHg OU (+2.1 mmHg OD, +2.7 mmHg OS); compared to the closest subsequent in-clinic visit, the difference was +2.3 mmHg OU (+2.1 mmHg OD, +2.5 mmHg OS). 68.6% of all drive-through IOPs were higher than corresponding in-clinic IOPs; 21.1% were lower. 25.9% of drive-through IOPs were higher by more than 5 mmHg, while 3.9% of drive-through IOPs were lower by more than 5 mmHg.
DISCUSSION: As teleophthalmology becomes an ever more important tool in glaucoma patient care, drive-through or walk-through IOP monitoring methods are likely to play an increasing role. However, our data reveals potential inaccuracies in drive-through iCare IOP measurements which tend to overestimate IOP. It is advisable to confirm large changes in IOP with in-clinic measurement prior to making management decisions.
CONCLUSION: With better optimization of accuracy and reliability of measurements, drive-through tonometry is a promising, high-throughput, low-contact method of measuring IOP.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 26
Intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine during the surgery to prevent postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European Journal of Medical Research 2024 April 19
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Management of Diverticulitis: A Review.JAMA Surgery 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app